Abstract
The classic text for discussions of self-sacrifice in Judaism is, as the peoples well know, the famous dispute between Rabbi Akiba and Ben Patura about two peoples in the desert; one holds the only flask of water, and the question is whether he should keep it for himself or not. The Bible, ever-anxious to impose responsibility, concerns itself with obligation alone, speaking only of what the finder must do. The Talmud, on the other hand, considers a much broader range of issues and adopts a more nuanced posture. Obliging the individual to stipulate so as to impose upon him the duty of hashavat avedah might also be considered an illegitimate extension of the biblical norm; the process of stipulation might, after all, be seen as non-intrinsic to the act of restoration. The scriptural passage, even as midrashically understood, only allows for two directives: either the people must attend to the lost object, or not.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | The Jewish Law Annual |
| Subtitle of host publication | Volume Eleven |
| Publisher | Taylor and Francis |
| Pages | 37-56 |
| Number of pages | 20 |
| Volume | 11 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9781317836698 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9783718605835 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Jan 2022 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Social Sciences
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'MINE AND THINE: THE PROBLEM OF PRIORITY IN CIVIL LAW (“HASHAVAT AVEDAH”)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver