Abstract
Current surgical and non-surgical eschar removal-debridement techniques are invasive or ineffective. A bromelainbased rapid and selective enzymatic debriding agent was developed to overcome these disadvantages and compared with the standard of care (SOC). The safety and efficacy of a novel Debriding Gel Dressing (DGD) was determined in patients with deep partial and full thickness burns covering up to 67% total body surface area (TBSA). This review summarizes data from seven studies, four of which were randomized clinical trials that included a SOC or control vehicle. DGD eschar debridement efficacy was >90% in all studies, comparable to the SOC and significantly greater than the control vehicle. The total area excised was less in patients treated with DGD compared with the control vehicle (22.9% vs. 73.2%, P<0.001) or the surgical/non-surgical SOC (50.5%, P=0.006). The incidence of surgical debridement in patients treated with DGD was lower than the SOC (40/163 [24.5%] vs. 119/170 [70.0%], P<0.001). Less autografting was used in all studies. Long-term scar quality and function were similar in DGD- and SOCtreated. DGD is a safe and effective method of burn debridement that offers an alternative to surgical and non-surgical SOC.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 264-274 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | Annals of Burns and Fire Disasters |
Volume | 28 |
Issue number | 4 |
State | Published - 1 Dec 2015 |
Keywords
- Burns
- DGD
- Debriding gel dressing
- Enzymatic debridement
- Enzymatic escharotomy
- NexoBrid®
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Emergency Medicine
- Emergency
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine