Moderation in the Scottish Enlightenment: the case of Robert Wallace

Elad Carmel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Robert Wallace (1697–1771) was a leading minister of the Church of Scotland, but he remains a largely overlooked figure in the literature. Nevertheless, his participation in philosophical and theological debates offers a glimpse of the complex positions of the Scottish clergy–and of Scottish moderation on its own terms. Wallace’s moderation was evident, for example, in his opposition both to radical deism and orthodox dogmatism. Yet what makes Wallace’s case particularly interesting is that he described himself as a ‘moderate freethinker’ in a letter to David Hume, while distinguishing elsewhere the ‘moderate’ and ‘sober’ freethinkers from the dangerously sceptical ones. Exploring his consistent statements on this issue in various writings throughout his career, this article investigates the self-identified moderation of Wallace–in opposition, for example, to his rival freethinker William Dudgeon–and thus the clergy’s attempt to use this category in the shaping of their vision of the Scottish Enlightenment.

Original languageEnglish
JournalHistory of European Ideas
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 1 Jan 2024
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Enlightenment
  • freethinking
  • moderation
  • Robert Wallace
  • William Dudgeon

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • History
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Philosophy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Moderation in the Scottish Enlightenment: the case of Robert Wallace'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this