Motivational Similarity and Interpersonal Evaluations: The Role of Ambiguity, Self‐Derogation, and Emotion

Avi Assor, Roy Aldor

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT The present study tests two hypotheses which are based on a motivational threat model of interpersonal evaluation: (a) Dominance‐ and dependency‐oriented perceivers evaluate motivationally similar others less favorably only when evaluation pertains to an ambiguous attribute and perceivers score high on self‐derogation; and (b) the relatively unfavorable evaluation of the similar target person is mediated by an arousal process. Males observed a working dyad in which one man was dominant and the other dependent, but both were ambiguous on sociability. Throughout the observation, subjects' emotion‐related skin conductance responses were monitored. Subjects then evaluated the target person they expected to meet and recalled information. Results supported the first hypothesis, but were only partially consistent with the second hypothesis. In addition, dominance‐oriented perceivers produced more assertiveness constructs than dependency‐oriented perceivers in free recall. The findings suggest that the threat model should be revised to include the moderating factors of attribute ambiguity and attitude toward the self, and perhaps also an additional mediating process: generalization of attitude toward the self to motivationally similar others.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)111-131
Number of pages21
JournalJournal of Personality
Volume61
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 1993

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Motivational Similarity and Interpersonal Evaluations: The Role of Ambiguity, Self‐Derogation, and Emotion'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this