Abstract
The term {Hebrew language presented} 'prepared' plays a central role in Tannaitic Sab-bath law. This article reviews the development of this term from linguistic, exegetical, and normative points of view. In Mishnaic Hebrew, {Hebrew language presented} and its negative form {Hebrew language presented} are archaic forms derived through nominaliza-tion from Exod 16:5. This linguistic legacy, shared with the Damascus Document, went through a process of reconceptualization in Tannaitic law. While the term remained fixed, its normative consequences were further developed and {Hebrew language presented} became a pivotal concept in the Tannaitic laws of con-sumption and handling. Although it would seem that the rise and decline of the term {Hebrew language presented} could be explained through the conceptual transformations of the Tannaitic and Amoraic eras, I argue that the conceptual and linguis-tic changes do not coincide and suggest alternative explanations for the emergence and eventual marginalization of {Hebrew language presented} .
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 259-276 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| Journal | Hebrew Studies |
| Volume | 61 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Jan 2020 |
| Externally published | Yes |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Cultural Studies
- History
- Religious studies
- Literature and Literary Theory
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Mukhan: The rise and fall of a halakic term'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver