TY - JOUR
T1 - Multiple sulfur isotopes discriminate organoclastic and methane-based sulfate reduction by sub-seafloor pyrite formation
AU - Liu, Jiarui
AU - Pellerin, André
AU - Wang, Jiasheng
AU - Rickard, David
AU - Antler, Gilad
AU - Zhao, Jie
AU - Wang, Zhou
AU - Jørgensen, Bo Barker
AU - Ono, Shuhei
N1 - Funding Information:
We gratefully acknowledge Gareth Izon for his contribution and technical prowess in quadruple sulfur isotope analysis. Further, we recognize the technical assistance of Fengyu Wang, William Olszewski, Thi Hao Bui, Chao Li, Zihu Zhang, Hans Røy, Jeanette Pedersen, Karina Bomholt Oest, Huyue Song, Wanjun Lu, Qi Lin and Junxia Yang whose guidance permeates all analytical aspects presented herein. Formative discussions with, and support from, Tina Treude, Alexandra V. Turchyn, Sabine Kasten and Genming Luo helped shape this manuscript. We gratefully acknowledge the crews and shipboard scientists aboard the R/Vs JOIDES Resolution, Aurora and Ocean VI in addition to sampling assistance from colleagues at the Center for Geomicrobiology. We thank Virgil Pasquier and an anonymous reviewer for their helpful and constructive reviews of this paper. This research used samples and data provided by IODP. Quadruple sulfur isotope analysis was performed at MIT, supported by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation under the auspices of the Deep Carbon Observatory (S.O.). Sampling and wet chemical analyses were funded by the State Key R&D Project of China (2018YFC031000404, 2016YFA0601102), National Natural Science Foundation of China (41772091, 41802025), China National Gas Hydrate Project (DD20160211), and Fundamental Research Funds for National Universities to China University of Geosciences, Wuhan (CUGCJ1710 and CUGQY1939). We acknowledge further financial support from the Danish National Research Foundation (DNRF grant #104), the Danish Council for Independent Research (DFF–7014-00196) and the European Research Council (ERC Advanced Grant #294200). J.L. acknowledges a NASA FINESST Fellowship (80NSSC21K1529) and financial support from the international exchange program administered by School of Earth Sciences, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan. A.P. is supported by the Zuckerman STEM Leadership Program. G.A. acknowledges financial support from the Israel Science Foundation (2361/19).
Funding Information:
We gratefully acknowledge Gareth Izon for his contribution and technical prowess in quadruple sulfur isotope analysis. Further, we recognize the technical assistance of Fengyu Wang, William Olszewski, Thi Hao Bui, Chao Li, Zihu Zhang, Hans R?y, Jeanette Pedersen, Karina Bomholt Oest, Huyue Song, Wanjun Lu, Qi Lin and Junxia Yang whose guidance permeates all analytical aspects presented herein. Formative discussions with, and support from, Tina Treude, Alexandra V. Turchyn, Sabine Kasten and Genming Luo helped shape this manuscript. We gratefully acknowledge the crews and shipboard scientists aboard the R/Vs JOIDES Resolution, Aurora and Ocean VI in addition to sampling assistance from colleagues at the Center for Geomicrobiology. We thank Virgil Pasquier and an anonymous reviewer for their helpful and constructive reviews of this paper. This research used samples and data provided by IODP. Quadruple sulfur isotope analysis was performed at MIT, supported by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation under the auspices of the Deep Carbon Observatory (S.O.). Sampling and wet chemical analyses were funded by the State Key R&D Project of China (2018YFC031000404, 2016YFA0601102), National Natural Science Foundation of China (41772091, 41802025), China National Gas Hydrate Project (DD20160211), and Fundamental Research Funds for National Universities to China University of Geosciences, Wuhan (CUGCJ1710 and CUGQY1939). We acknowledge further financial support from the Danish National Research Foundation (DNRF grant #104), the Danish Council for Independent Research (DFF?7014-00196) and the European Research Council (ERC Advanced Grant #294200). J.L. acknowledges a NASA FINESST Fellowship (80NSSC21K1529) and financial support from the international exchange program administered by School of Earth Sciences, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan. A.P. is supported by the Zuckerman STEM Leadership Program. G.A. acknowledges financial support from the Israel Science Foundation (2361/19).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2022/1/1
Y1 - 2022/1/1
N2 - The marine sulfate inventory represents the largest standing pool of electron acceptors, which, via microbial sulfate reduction, is responsible for roughly half of the organic matter mineralization globally in marine sediments. In addition to the oxidation of buried organic matter, sulfate reduction can be coupled to the oxidation of methane migrating upward. Multiple sulfur isotope ratios were measured for porewater sulfate, sulfide, elemental sulfur and pyrite from core samples collected from continental shelf (19–96 m water depth) in the Baltic Sea and slope (1098 m water depth) in the Andaman Sea, in order to test if their isotope systematics can be used to trace the two different sulfate reduction processes. For shallow shelf sediments (<43 cm below seafloor), both δ34S and Δ33S values of porewater sulfate increased with increasing depth as a result of organoclastic sulfate reduction (OSR). However, the Δ33S values of both porewater sulfate and sulfide decreased as the δ34S values increased downcore at 43–73 cm depth where sulfate reduction was coupled to anaerobic oxidation of methane (AOM). Pyrite in shelf sediments yielded positive Δ33S values, reflecting Δ33S of porewater sulfide produced by OSR. In contrast, pyrite in slope sediments yielded negative Δ33S values as low as −0.15‰, as a result of mixing of sulfides derived from OSR and AOM. This is consistent with the slowly migrating sulfate–methane transition (SMT) in slope sediments inferred from sulfur and iron speciation, carbon isotope ratios of carbonates, and magnetic susceptibility data. A stable SMT, focusing AOM at roughly the same depth over the past few millennia, further provides favorable conditions for prolonged pyrite formation with the development of cubic crystals, while the sulfur isotope difference between bulk pyrite and macroscopic pyrite reflects the significance of OSR throughout the sediment column. We conclude that minor sulfur isotopes provide a unique proxy that can be applied to differentiate OSR and AOM and the origin of pyrite in diverse sediments and sedimentary rocks. This contribution highlights strong local diagenetic controls on pyrite formation and its multiple sulfur isotopic composition in various marine settings.
AB - The marine sulfate inventory represents the largest standing pool of electron acceptors, which, via microbial sulfate reduction, is responsible for roughly half of the organic matter mineralization globally in marine sediments. In addition to the oxidation of buried organic matter, sulfate reduction can be coupled to the oxidation of methane migrating upward. Multiple sulfur isotope ratios were measured for porewater sulfate, sulfide, elemental sulfur and pyrite from core samples collected from continental shelf (19–96 m water depth) in the Baltic Sea and slope (1098 m water depth) in the Andaman Sea, in order to test if their isotope systematics can be used to trace the two different sulfate reduction processes. For shallow shelf sediments (<43 cm below seafloor), both δ34S and Δ33S values of porewater sulfate increased with increasing depth as a result of organoclastic sulfate reduction (OSR). However, the Δ33S values of both porewater sulfate and sulfide decreased as the δ34S values increased downcore at 43–73 cm depth where sulfate reduction was coupled to anaerobic oxidation of methane (AOM). Pyrite in shelf sediments yielded positive Δ33S values, reflecting Δ33S of porewater sulfide produced by OSR. In contrast, pyrite in slope sediments yielded negative Δ33S values as low as −0.15‰, as a result of mixing of sulfides derived from OSR and AOM. This is consistent with the slowly migrating sulfate–methane transition (SMT) in slope sediments inferred from sulfur and iron speciation, carbon isotope ratios of carbonates, and magnetic susceptibility data. A stable SMT, focusing AOM at roughly the same depth over the past few millennia, further provides favorable conditions for prolonged pyrite formation with the development of cubic crystals, while the sulfur isotope difference between bulk pyrite and macroscopic pyrite reflects the significance of OSR throughout the sediment column. We conclude that minor sulfur isotopes provide a unique proxy that can be applied to differentiate OSR and AOM and the origin of pyrite in diverse sediments and sedimentary rocks. This contribution highlights strong local diagenetic controls on pyrite formation and its multiple sulfur isotopic composition in various marine settings.
KW - Anaerobic oxidation of methane
KW - Morphology of euhedral pyrite crystals
KW - Ocean margin sediments
KW - Organoclastic sulfate reduction
KW - Quadruple sulfur isotopes
KW - Sulfate–methane transition
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85118323219&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.gca.2021.09.026
DO - 10.1016/j.gca.2021.09.026
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85118323219
SN - 0016-7037
VL - 316
SP - 309
EP - 330
JO - Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta
JF - Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta
ER -