N–2 repetition leads to a cost within working memory and a benefit outside it

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

Removal has been suggested to play a key role in controlling the contents of working memory. The present study examined the aftereffects of removal in a working memory updating task. Participants performed the reference-back paradigm, a version of the n-back task that is composed of two trial types: reference trials that required working memory updating and comparison trials that did not require updating. N–2 repetition effects—the difference in performance between trials that presented the same stimulus as the one presented two trials before (ABA sequences) and trials in which the stimulus differed from the two previous stimuli (ABC sequences)—were examined. In two experiments, n–2 repetition costs were observed within sequences of reference trials, while n–2 repetition benefits were observed within sequences of comparison trials. This pattern suggests that removal takes place during working memory updating. Furthermore, automatic formation and updating of representation outside working memory, which takes place in comparison trials and gives rise to n–2 repetition benefits, does not involve removal. Removal, demonstrated by phenomena such as n–2 repetition costs, is therefore proposed to be a marker for the utilization of working memory within a given task.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)268-277
Number of pages10
JournalAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Volume1424
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2018

Keywords

  • Reference-back
  • Removal
  • Updating
  • Working memory
  • n-2 repetition

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience (all)
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (all)
  • History and Philosophy of Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'N–2 repetition leads to a cost within working memory and a benefit outside it'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this