Needle thoracostomy for tension pneumothorax: The Israeli Defense Forces experience

Jacob Chen, Roy Nadler, Dagan Schwartz, Homer Tien, Andrew P. Cap, Elon Glassberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Point of injury needle thoracostomy (NT) for tension pneumothorax is potentially lifesaving. Recent data raised concerns regarding the efficacy of conventional NT devices. Owing to these considerations, the Israeli Defense Forces Medical Corps (IDF-MC) recently introduced a longer, wider, more durable catheter for the performance of rapid chest decompression. The present series represents the IDF-MC experience with chest decompression by NT. Methods: We reviewed the IDF trauma registry from January 1997 to October 2012 to identify all cases in which NT was attempted. Results: During the study period a total of 111 patients underwent chest decompression by NT. Most casualties (54%) were wounded as a result of gunshot wounds (GSW); motor vehicle accidents (MVAs) were the second leading cause (16%). Most (79%) NTs were performed at the point of injury, while the rest were performed during evacuation by ambulance or helicopter (13% and 4%, respectively). Decreased breath sounds on the affected side were one of the most frequent clinical indications for NT, recorded in 28% of cases. Decreased breath sounds were more common in surviving than in nonsurviving patients. (37% v. 19%, p < 0.001). A chest tube was installed on the field in 35 patients (32%), all after NT. Conclusion: Standard NT has a high failure rate on the battlefield. Alternative measures for chest decompression, such as the Vygon catheter, appear to be a feasible alternative to conventional NT.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)S118-S124
JournalCanadian Journal of Surgery
Volume58
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jun 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Needle thoracostomy for tension pneumothorax: The Israeli Defense Forces experience'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this