Numerical representation: Abstract or nonabstract?

  • Roi Cohen Kadosh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

26 Scopus citations

Abstract

Until now it has been a commonly held view that numbers are represented abstractly in the human brain. However, a recent imaging study challenged the existence of an abstract representation at least of digits and number words, at the brain level, and argued that previous studies and paradigms were not sensitive enough to detect deviations from abstract representation at the behavioural level. The current study addressed this issue with an analysis of distance and sequential effects in magnitude classification. Previous studies that used this paradigm did not find deviation from abstract representation for digits and number words (e.g., Dehaene, 1996; Schwarz and Ischebeck, 2000). However, in the current study a short stimulus-response interval was used, which reduced subjective expectancy and increased automatic processing. The current results showed deviation from abstract representation in both reaction time and accuracy and therefore support the idea that nonabstract representations of numbers do exist.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1160-1168
Number of pages9
JournalQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
Volume61
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Aug 2007
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Distance effect
  • Numerical cognition
  • Representation
  • Sequential effect

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • General Psychology
  • Physiology (medical)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Numerical representation: Abstract or nonabstract?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this