Objective information, intersubjectivity, and Popper's three worlds

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

Does information exist in the world independently of brains and/or organisms that can interpret it? Answering this question is important for clarifying the theoretical foundations of the sciences of mind and brain. This chapter claims that Popperian objectivity-properly modified-is sufficient for the explanatory role that information often plays in these sciences without endorsing a problematic mind-independent notion of information. There exists, however, a tension between two Popperian views about objectivity: intersubjective agreement and World 3. In order to ground the objectivity of information-as it is used in the sciences of mind and brain, the relation between Popperian intersubjectivity and World 3 objectivity is examined in this chapter. The conclusion is that mind-dependent information can be objective when it is intersubjectively agreed upon, or, to put it differently, when "actualised" information in World 3 stands in the right relation to World 1.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationKarl Popper's Science and Philosophy
EditorsDavid Merritt, Zuzana Parusniková
PublisherSpringer International Publishing
Pages345-359
Number of pages15
ISBN (Electronic)9783030670368
ISBN (Print)9783030670351
DOIs
StatePublished - 19 Jul 2021

Keywords

  • Cognition
  • Function
  • Information
  • Intersubjectivity
  • Receiver
  • World 3

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Physics and Astronomy
  • General Arts and Humanities

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Objective information, intersubjectivity, and Popper's three worlds'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this