Abstract
Acute aortic dissection (AAD) is a life-threatening condition for which prompt diagnosis is essential for successful management. The imaging modalities for demonstrating the dissecting membrane include retrograde aortography, contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT), transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), and magnetic resonance imaging. Of these, aortography had long been considered the gold standard in diagnosing aortic dissection. We present a case of AAD in which contrast-enhanced CT and retrograde aortography failed to demonstrate an aortic membranous flap, whereas TEE swiftly provided clear-cut evidence of the pathology. TEE should be considered when AAD is suspected despite negative findings on other imaging modalities.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 95-97 |
| Number of pages | 3 |
| Journal | Heart Surgery Forum |
| Volume | 7 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Jan 2004 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Surgery
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Obstacles in the diagnosis of acute aortic dissection'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver