TY - JOUR
T1 - Office-Based Ambulatory Sedation-The Use of the Airway Protector System During Oral Surgery
T2 - A Prospective Audit of the First 100 Patients
AU - Klein, Moti
AU - Weksler, Natan
AU - Weksler, Doron
AU - Bodner, Lipa
PY - 2008/5/1
Y1 - 2008/5/1
N2 - Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of the "Airway Protector System" (APS), a simple homemade device used for airway control during office-based dental sedation. Patients and Methods: A prospective audit was performed in 100 severely dental phobic patients submitted to dental treatment in a dentist office under propofol sedation. Results: Sixty-eight females and 32 males were enrolled in this study. The mean age was 45 ± 7 years (range, 18 to 67 years). A clear airway was obtained in 94 patients. Partial airway obstruction was observed in 4 patients but manual lifting of the jaw was enough to free the partial obstruction and dental treatment was uneventfully conducted. In 2 patients, the APS had to be converted to formal nasotracheal intubation because jaw-lifting maneuvers did not adequately relieve a partial airway obstruction. Sore throat was reported in 56 patients. In 27 cases, the patients rated the complaint as severe. No patient required a chest x-ray after sedation, as there was no clinical evidence of any pulmonary complication including dyspnea, cough, or fever. Conclusion: We suggest that the concomitant use of a homemade cuffed nasopharyngeal airway with continuous suction facilitates airway control during deep levels of office-based sedation for dental treatment in severely dental phobic patients.
AB - Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of the "Airway Protector System" (APS), a simple homemade device used for airway control during office-based dental sedation. Patients and Methods: A prospective audit was performed in 100 severely dental phobic patients submitted to dental treatment in a dentist office under propofol sedation. Results: Sixty-eight females and 32 males were enrolled in this study. The mean age was 45 ± 7 years (range, 18 to 67 years). A clear airway was obtained in 94 patients. Partial airway obstruction was observed in 4 patients but manual lifting of the jaw was enough to free the partial obstruction and dental treatment was uneventfully conducted. In 2 patients, the APS had to be converted to formal nasotracheal intubation because jaw-lifting maneuvers did not adequately relieve a partial airway obstruction. Sore throat was reported in 56 patients. In 27 cases, the patients rated the complaint as severe. No patient required a chest x-ray after sedation, as there was no clinical evidence of any pulmonary complication including dyspnea, cough, or fever. Conclusion: We suggest that the concomitant use of a homemade cuffed nasopharyngeal airway with continuous suction facilitates airway control during deep levels of office-based sedation for dental treatment in severely dental phobic patients.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=42149093773&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.joms.2007.12.047
DO - 10.1016/j.joms.2007.12.047
M3 - Article
C2 - 18423271
AN - SCOPUS:42149093773
SN - 0278-2391
VL - 66
SP - 858
EP - 863
JO - Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
JF - Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
IS - 5
ER -