On the Nonexistence of Verb-Stranding VP-Ellipsis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


An increasingly popular analysis of object gap sentences in many languages derives them in two steps: (a) V-raising out of VP, and (b) VP-ellipsis of the remnant, stranding the verb (V-stranding VP-ellipsis, VSVPE). For Hebrew, Hindi, Russian, and Portuguese, I show this analysis to be inadequate. First, it undergenerates elliptical objects in various environments, and second, it overgenerates nonexisting adjunct-including readings. For all the problematic data, simple argument ellipsis provides a unified explanation. The absence of VSVPE in languages that do allow V-raising and Aux-stranding VP-ellipsis raises an intriguing problem for theories addressing the interaction of head movement and ellipsis.
Original languageEnglish GB
Pages (from-to)341-365
Number of pages25
JournalLinguistic Inquiry
Issue number2
StatePublished - 30 Mar 2020


  • verb stranding
  • VP-ellipsis
  • argument ellipsis


Dive into the research topics of 'On the Nonexistence of Verb-Stranding VP-Ellipsis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this