On the optimal allocation of prizes in best-of-three all-pay auctions

Aner Sela, Oz Tsahi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

We study best-of-three all-pay auctions with two players who compete in three stages with a single match per stage. The first player to win two matches wins the contest. We assume that a prize sum is given, and show that if players are symmetric, the allocation of prizes does not have any effect on the players’ expected total effort. On the other hand, if players are asymmetric, in order to maximize the players’ expected total effort, independent of the players’ types, it is not optimal to allocate a single final prize to the winner. Instead, it is optimal to allocate intermediate prizes in the first stage or/and in the second stage in addition to the final prize. When the asymmetry of the players’ types is sufficiently high, it is optimal to allocate intermediate prizes in both two first stages and a final prize to the winner.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)255-273
Number of pages19
JournalSocial Choice and Welfare
Volume55
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Aug 2020

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Economics and Econometrics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'On the optimal allocation of prizes in best-of-three all-pay auctions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this