On the Richter-Thomassen conjecture about pairwise intersecting closed curves

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

    6 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    A long standing conjecture of Richter and Thomassen states that the total number of intersection points between any n simple closed Jordan curves in the plane, so that any two of them intersect and no three curves pass through the same point, is at least (1-O (1))n2. We confirm the above conjecture in several important cases, including the case (1) when all curves are convex, and (2) when the family of curves can be partitioned into two equal classes such that each curve from the first class is touching every curve from the second class. (Two curves are said to be touching if they have precisely one point in common, at which they do not properly cross.) An important ingredient of our proofs is the following statement: Let S be a family of the graphs of n continuous real functions defined on ℝ, no three of which pass through the same point. If there are nt pairs of touching curves in S, then the number of crossing points is ω (nt √logt/log log t).

    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationProceedings of the 26th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, SODA 2015
    PublisherAssociation for Computing Machinery
    Pages1506-1516
    Number of pages11
    Volume2015-January
    ISBN (Electronic)9781611973747
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 1 Jan 2015
    Event26th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, SODA 2015 - San Diego, United States
    Duration: 4 Jan 20156 Jan 2015

    Conference

    Conference26th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, SODA 2015
    Country/TerritoryUnited States
    CitySan Diego
    Period4/01/156/01/15

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Software
    • General Mathematics

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'On the Richter-Thomassen conjecture about pairwise intersecting closed curves'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this