Oncologists’ Treatment Responses to Mental Health Distress in Their Cancer Patients

Leeat Granek, Ora Nakash, Merav Ben-David, Shahar Shapira, Samuel Ariad

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

17 Scopus citations


The objectives of this study were to identify how oncologists respond to mental health distress in their patients, what specific strategies they use in treating this distress, and what barriers they report responding to their patients’ emotional distress. Twenty-three oncologists at two cancer centers were interviewed. The grounded theory method of data collection and analysis was used. Oncologists varied in their response to patients’ emotional distress. Strategies used in responding to patients’ distress included creating supportive relationships and prescribing medications, while barriers included patient reluctance, a lack of protocol on how to respond to patients, limited psychosocial resources, and a lack of time. Developing and adopting clear guidelines to addressing mental health distress among cancer patients is critical in assuring quality care for the whole patient and reduce the risk for poor quality of life and potential disease-related morbidity and mortality.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1735-1745
Number of pages11
JournalQualitative Health Research
Issue number11
StatePublished - 1 Sep 2018


  • Grounded Theory
  • Israel
  • cancer
  • mental health distress
  • oncologists
  • qualitative methods

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health


Dive into the research topics of 'Oncologists’ Treatment Responses to Mental Health Distress in Their Cancer Patients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this