TY - JOUR
T1 - Open-source automated insulin delivery systems (OS-AIDs) in a pediatric population with type 1 diabetes in a real-life setting
T2 - the AWeSoMe study group experience
AU - Nir, Judith
AU - Rachmiel, Marianna
AU - Fraser, Abigail
AU - Lebenthal, Yael
AU - Brener, Avivit
AU - Pinhas-Hamiel, Orit
AU - Haim, Alon
AU - Stern, Eve
AU - Levek, Noa
AU - Ben-Ari, Tal
AU - Landau, Zohar
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2023/5/24
Y1 - 2023/5/24
N2 - Purpose: The use of open-source automated insulin delivery systems (OS-AIDs), for the management of type 1 diabetes (T1D), has increased over recent years in all age groups. Real-life data has demonstrated the safety and efficacy of these systems, however, studies in the pediatric population remain limited. In this study, we aimed to examine the effect of transition to an OS-AIDs on glycemic parameters, and on several aspects related to quality of life. In addition, we aimed to characterize the socioeconomic position of families who chose this treatment modality, assess their motivations to do so, and evaluate treatment satisfaction. Methods: In this multi-center observational real-life study from the AWeSoMe Group, we compared glycemic parameters of 52 individuals with T1D (56% males, mean diabetes duration 4.2 ± 3.9 years), from the last clinic visit prior to OS-AIDs initiation to the most recent clinic visit while using the system. Socioeconomic position (SEP) index was retrieved from the Israel Central Bureau of Statistics. Caregivers completed questionnaires assessing reasons for system initiation and treatment satisfaction. Results: Mean age at OS-AIDs initiation was 11.2 ± 4 years, range 3.3–20.7 years with a median usage duration of 11.1 months (range 3–45.7). Mean SEP Index was 1.033 ± 0.956 (value range: −2.797 to 2.590). Time in range (TIR) of 70 to 180 mg/dl increased from 69.0 ± 11.9 to 75.5 ± 11.7%, (P < 0.001), and HbA1c decreased from 6.9 ± 0.7 to 6.4 ± 0.6%, (P < 0.001). Time in tight range (TITR) of 70 to 140 mg/dl increased from 49.7 ± 12.9 to 58.8 ± 10.8% (P < 0.001). No episodes of severe hypoglycemia or DKA were reported. Reduction in diabetes burden and sleep quality improvement were the main reasons for OS-AID initiation. Conclusions: In our cohort of youth with T1D, the transition to an OS-AID resulted in greater TIR and less severe hypoglycemia regardless of age, diabetes duration or SEP, which was found to be above average. The overall improvement in glycemic parameters in our study population with excellent baseline glycemic control, provides additional evidence of beneficence and efficacy of OS-AIDs in the pediatric population.
AB - Purpose: The use of open-source automated insulin delivery systems (OS-AIDs), for the management of type 1 diabetes (T1D), has increased over recent years in all age groups. Real-life data has demonstrated the safety and efficacy of these systems, however, studies in the pediatric population remain limited. In this study, we aimed to examine the effect of transition to an OS-AIDs on glycemic parameters, and on several aspects related to quality of life. In addition, we aimed to characterize the socioeconomic position of families who chose this treatment modality, assess their motivations to do so, and evaluate treatment satisfaction. Methods: In this multi-center observational real-life study from the AWeSoMe Group, we compared glycemic parameters of 52 individuals with T1D (56% males, mean diabetes duration 4.2 ± 3.9 years), from the last clinic visit prior to OS-AIDs initiation to the most recent clinic visit while using the system. Socioeconomic position (SEP) index was retrieved from the Israel Central Bureau of Statistics. Caregivers completed questionnaires assessing reasons for system initiation and treatment satisfaction. Results: Mean age at OS-AIDs initiation was 11.2 ± 4 years, range 3.3–20.7 years with a median usage duration of 11.1 months (range 3–45.7). Mean SEP Index was 1.033 ± 0.956 (value range: −2.797 to 2.590). Time in range (TIR) of 70 to 180 mg/dl increased from 69.0 ± 11.9 to 75.5 ± 11.7%, (P < 0.001), and HbA1c decreased from 6.9 ± 0.7 to 6.4 ± 0.6%, (P < 0.001). Time in tight range (TITR) of 70 to 140 mg/dl increased from 49.7 ± 12.9 to 58.8 ± 10.8% (P < 0.001). No episodes of severe hypoglycemia or DKA were reported. Reduction in diabetes burden and sleep quality improvement were the main reasons for OS-AID initiation. Conclusions: In our cohort of youth with T1D, the transition to an OS-AID resulted in greater TIR and less severe hypoglycemia regardless of age, diabetes duration or SEP, which was found to be above average. The overall improvement in glycemic parameters in our study population with excellent baseline glycemic control, provides additional evidence of beneficence and efficacy of OS-AIDs in the pediatric population.
KW - Adolescents
KW - Automated insulin delivery system
KW - Open-source
KW - Pediatric
KW - Type 1 diabetes
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85160263806&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s12020-023-03398-4
DO - 10.1007/s12020-023-03398-4
M3 - Article
C2 - 37222881
AN - SCOPUS:85160263806
SN - 1355-008X
VL - 81
SP - 262
EP - 269
JO - Endocrine
JF - Endocrine
IS - 2
ER -