Optimistic, but selling riskier stocks-An arbitrage experiment in crisis market

Doron Sonsino, Tal Shavit

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

The field-based experimental approach was utilized to collect zero-investment portfolios from more than 100 competent investors at the peak of the financial crisis. The average annual return on 117 arbitrage portfolios was 5.2% with 55% profitability rate, but prior self-confidence strongly correlates with eventual performance with yearly returns reaching 26% for the highest confidence quartile. The stocks selected for short-sale were riskier than the stocks selected for purchase and time-series estimations show that the unbalanced positions diminished profitability while markets recuperated. As most participants anticipated the recovery at the time of decision, the selling of riskier stocks suggests that "misperception of financial risk" (Shefrin, 1999) impaired performance.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)61-73
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance
Volume1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Optimistic, but selling riskier stocks-An arbitrage experiment in crisis market'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this