TY - JOUR
T1 - Patient-reported wellbeing and clinical disease measures over time captured by multivariate trajectories of disease activity in individuals with juvenile idiopathic arthritis in the UK
T2 - a multicentre prospective longitudinal study
AU - CAPS the CLUSTER Consortium
AU - Shoop-Worrall, Stephanie J.W.
AU - Hyrich, Kimme L.
AU - Wedderburn, Lucy R.
AU - Thomson, Wendy
AU - Geifman, Nophar
AU - Baildam, Eileen
AU - Barnes, Michael
AU - Beresford, Michael W.
AU - Carlsson, Emil
AU - Chieng, Alice
AU - Ciurtin, Coziana
AU - Cleary, Gavin
AU - Davidson, Joyce
AU - Dekaj, Fatjon
AU - Dews, Sally Anne
AU - Dick, Andrew
AU - Diogo, Gil
AU - Duerr, Teresa
AU - Fairlie, Joanna
AU - Foster, Helen
AU - Gritzfeld, Jenna F.
AU - Ioannou, Yiannis
AU - Jebson, Beth
AU - Kartawinata, Melissa
AU - Kent, Toby
AU - Kimonyo, Aline
AU - Lawson-Tovey, Saskia
AU - Lin, Wei Yu
AU - Martin, Paul
AU - McErlane, Flora
AU - Merali, Fatema
AU - Morris, Andrew
AU - Neale, Helen
AU - Neisen, Jessica
AU - Ng, Sandra
AU - Ralph, Elizabeth
AU - Ramanan, Athimalaipet V.
AU - Raychaudhuri, Soumya
AU - Robinson, Emily
AU - Smith, Samantha
AU - Sumner, Emma
AU - Tarasek, Damian
AU - Wallace, Chris
AU - Wanstall, Zoe
AU - Yarwood, Annie
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license
PY - 2021/2/1
Y1 - 2021/2/1
N2 - Background: Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is a heterogeneous disease, the signs and symptoms of which can be summarised with use of composite disease activity measures, including the clinical Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score (cJADAS). However, clusters of children and young people might experience different global patterns in their signs and symptoms of disease, which might run in parallel or diverge over time. We aimed to identify such clusters in the 3 years after a diagnosis of JIA. The identification of these clusters would allow for a greater understanding of disease progression in JIA, including how physician-reported and patient-reported outcomes relate to each other over the JIA disease course. Methods: In this multicentre prospective longitudinal study, we included children and young people recruited before Jan 1, 2015, to the Childhood Arthritis Prospective Study (CAPS), a UK multicentre inception cohort. Participants without a cJADAS score were excluded. To assess groups of children and young people with similar disease patterns in active joint count, physician's global assessment, and patient or parental global evaluation, we used latent profile analysis at initial presentation to paediatric rheumatology and multivariate group-based trajectory models for the following 3 years. Optimal models were selected on the basis of a combination of model fit, clinical plausibility, and model parsimony. Finding: Between Jan 1, 2001, and Dec 31, 2014, 1423 children and young people with JIA were recruited to CAPS, 239 of whom were excluded, resulting in a final study population of 1184 children and young people. We identified five clusters at baseline and six trajectory groups using longitudinal follow-up data. Disease course was not well predicted from clusters at baseline; however, in both cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses, substantial proportions of children and young people had high patient or parent global scores despite low or improving joint counts and physician global scores. Participants in these groups were older, and a higher proportion of them had enthesitis-related JIA and lower socioeconomic status, compared with those in other groups. Interpretation: Almost one in four children and young people with JIA in our study reported persistent, high patient or parent global scores despite having low or improving active joint counts and physician's global scores. Distinct patient subgroups defined by disease manifestation or trajectories of progression could help to better personalise health-care services and treatment plans for individuals with JIA. Funding: Medical Research Council, Versus Arthritis, Great Ormond Street Hospital Children's Charity, Olivia's Vision, and National Institute for Health Research.
AB - Background: Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is a heterogeneous disease, the signs and symptoms of which can be summarised with use of composite disease activity measures, including the clinical Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score (cJADAS). However, clusters of children and young people might experience different global patterns in their signs and symptoms of disease, which might run in parallel or diverge over time. We aimed to identify such clusters in the 3 years after a diagnosis of JIA. The identification of these clusters would allow for a greater understanding of disease progression in JIA, including how physician-reported and patient-reported outcomes relate to each other over the JIA disease course. Methods: In this multicentre prospective longitudinal study, we included children and young people recruited before Jan 1, 2015, to the Childhood Arthritis Prospective Study (CAPS), a UK multicentre inception cohort. Participants without a cJADAS score were excluded. To assess groups of children and young people with similar disease patterns in active joint count, physician's global assessment, and patient or parental global evaluation, we used latent profile analysis at initial presentation to paediatric rheumatology and multivariate group-based trajectory models for the following 3 years. Optimal models were selected on the basis of a combination of model fit, clinical plausibility, and model parsimony. Finding: Between Jan 1, 2001, and Dec 31, 2014, 1423 children and young people with JIA were recruited to CAPS, 239 of whom were excluded, resulting in a final study population of 1184 children and young people. We identified five clusters at baseline and six trajectory groups using longitudinal follow-up data. Disease course was not well predicted from clusters at baseline; however, in both cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses, substantial proportions of children and young people had high patient or parent global scores despite low or improving joint counts and physician global scores. Participants in these groups were older, and a higher proportion of them had enthesitis-related JIA and lower socioeconomic status, compared with those in other groups. Interpretation: Almost one in four children and young people with JIA in our study reported persistent, high patient or parent global scores despite having low or improving active joint counts and physician's global scores. Distinct patient subgroups defined by disease manifestation or trajectories of progression could help to better personalise health-care services and treatment plans for individuals with JIA. Funding: Medical Research Council, Versus Arthritis, Great Ormond Street Hospital Children's Charity, Olivia's Vision, and National Institute for Health Research.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85097886139&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S2665-9913(20)30269-1
DO - 10.1016/S2665-9913(20)30269-1
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85097886139
SN - 2665-9913
VL - 3
SP - e111-e121
JO - The Lancet Rheumatology
JF - The Lancet Rheumatology
IS - 2
ER -