Pedestrians' understanding of fully autonomous vehicles (FAV) intent to stop

Michal Hochman, Tal Oron-Gilad

Research output: Contribution to journalConference articlepeer-review

Abstract

This study explored pedestrians' understanding of Fully Autonomous Vehicle (FAV) intention and what influences their decision to cross. Twenty participants saw fixed simulated urban road crossing scenes with a FAV present on the road. The scenes differed from one another in the FAV's messages: The external Human-Machine Interfaces (e-HMI) background color, message type and modality, the FAV's distance from the crossing place, and its size. Eye-tracking data and objective measurements were collected. Results revealed that pedestrians looked at the e-HMI before making their decision; however, they did not always make the decision according to the e-HMIs' color, instructions (in advice messages), or intention (in status messages). Moreover, when they acted according to the e-HMI proposition, for certain distance conditions, they tended to hesitate before making the decision. Findings suggest that pedestrians' decision making to cross depends on a combination of the e-HMI implementation and the car distance. Future work should explore the robustness of the findings in dynamic and more complex crossing environments.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1931-1932
Number of pages2
JournalProceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
Volume64
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2020
Event64th International Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, HFES 2020 - Virtual, Online
Duration: 5 Oct 20209 Oct 2020

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Human Factors and Ergonomics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Pedestrians' understanding of fully autonomous vehicles (FAV) intent to stop'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this