Abstract
This study explored pedestrians' understanding of Fully Autonomous Vehicle (FAV) intention and what influences their decision to cross. Twenty participants saw fixed simulated urban road crossing scenes with a FAV present on the road. The scenes differed from one another in the FAV's messages: The external Human-Machine Interfaces (e-HMI) background color, message type and modality, the FAV's distance from the crossing place, and its size. Eye-tracking data and objective measurements were collected. Results revealed that pedestrians looked at the e-HMI before making their decision; however, they did not always make the decision according to the e-HMIs' color, instructions (in advice messages), or intention (in status messages). Moreover, when they acted according to the e-HMI proposition, for certain distance conditions, they tended to hesitate before making the decision. Findings suggest that pedestrians' decision making to cross depends on a combination of the e-HMI implementation and the car distance. Future work should explore the robustness of the findings in dynamic and more complex crossing environments.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1931-1932 |
| Number of pages | 2 |
| Journal | Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society |
| Volume | 64 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Jan 2020 |
| Event | 64th International Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, HFES 2020 - Virtual, Online Duration: 5 Oct 2020 → 9 Oct 2020 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Human Factors and Ergonomics