TY - JOUR
T1 - Peer support for people with severe mental illness versus usual care in high-, middle- A nd low-income countries
T2 - Study protocol for a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled trial (UPSIDES-RCT)
AU - Moran, Galia S.
AU - Kalha, Jasmine
AU - Mueller-Stierlin, Annabel S.
AU - Kilian, Reinhold
AU - Krumm, Silvia
AU - Slade, Mike
AU - Charles, Ashleigh
AU - Mahlke, Candelaria
AU - Nixdorf, Rebecca
AU - Basangwa, David
AU - Nakku, Juliet
AU - Mpango, Richard
AU - Ryan, Grace
AU - Shamba, Donat
AU - Ramesh, Mary
AU - Ngakongwa, Fileuka
AU - Grayzman, Alina
AU - Pathare, Soumitra
AU - Mayer, Benjamin
AU - Puschner, Bernd
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Author(s).
PY - 2020/5/1
Y1 - 2020/5/1
N2 - Background: Peer support is an established intervention involving a person recovering from mental illness supporting others with mental illness. Peer support is an under-used resource in global mental health. Building upon comprehensive formative research, this study will rigorously evaluate the impact of peer support at multiple levels, including service user outcomes (psychosocial and clinical), peer support worker outcomes (work role and empowerment), service outcomes (cost-effectiveness and return on investment), and implementation outcomes (adoption, sustainability and organisational change). Methods: UPSIDES-RCT is a pragmatic, parallel-group, multicentre, randomised controlled trial assessing the effectiveness of using peer support in developing empowering mental health services (UPSIDES) at four measurement points over 1 year (baseline, 4-, 8- A nd 12-month follow-up), with embedded process evaluation and cost-effectiveness analysis. Research will take place in a range of high-, middle- A nd low-income countries (Germany, UK, Israel, India, Uganda and Tanzania). The primary outcome is social inclusion of service users with severe mental illness (N = 558; N = 93 per site) at 8-month follow-up, measured with the Social Inclusion Scale. Secondary outcomes include empowerment (using the Empowerment Scale), hope (using the HOPE scale), recovery (using Stages of Recovery) and health and social functioning (using the Health of the Nations Outcome Scales). Mixed-methods process evaluation will investigate mediators and moderators of effect and the implementation experiences of four UPSIDES stakeholder groups (service users, peer support workers, mental health workers and policy makers). A cost-effectiveness analysis examining cost-utility and health budget impact will estimate the value for money of UPSIDES peer support. Discussion: The UPSIDES-RCT will explore the essential components necessary to create a peer support model in mental health care, while providing the evidence required to sustain and eventually scale-up the intervention in different cultural, organisational and resource settings. By actively involving and empowering service users, UPSIDES will move mental health systems toward a recovery orientation, emphasising user-centredness, community participation and the realisation of mental health as a human right.
AB - Background: Peer support is an established intervention involving a person recovering from mental illness supporting others with mental illness. Peer support is an under-used resource in global mental health. Building upon comprehensive formative research, this study will rigorously evaluate the impact of peer support at multiple levels, including service user outcomes (psychosocial and clinical), peer support worker outcomes (work role and empowerment), service outcomes (cost-effectiveness and return on investment), and implementation outcomes (adoption, sustainability and organisational change). Methods: UPSIDES-RCT is a pragmatic, parallel-group, multicentre, randomised controlled trial assessing the effectiveness of using peer support in developing empowering mental health services (UPSIDES) at four measurement points over 1 year (baseline, 4-, 8- A nd 12-month follow-up), with embedded process evaluation and cost-effectiveness analysis. Research will take place in a range of high-, middle- A nd low-income countries (Germany, UK, Israel, India, Uganda and Tanzania). The primary outcome is social inclusion of service users with severe mental illness (N = 558; N = 93 per site) at 8-month follow-up, measured with the Social Inclusion Scale. Secondary outcomes include empowerment (using the Empowerment Scale), hope (using the HOPE scale), recovery (using Stages of Recovery) and health and social functioning (using the Health of the Nations Outcome Scales). Mixed-methods process evaluation will investigate mediators and moderators of effect and the implementation experiences of four UPSIDES stakeholder groups (service users, peer support workers, mental health workers and policy makers). A cost-effectiveness analysis examining cost-utility and health budget impact will estimate the value for money of UPSIDES peer support. Discussion: The UPSIDES-RCT will explore the essential components necessary to create a peer support model in mental health care, while providing the evidence required to sustain and eventually scale-up the intervention in different cultural, organisational and resource settings. By actively involving and empowering service users, UPSIDES will move mental health systems toward a recovery orientation, emphasising user-centredness, community participation and the realisation of mental health as a human right.
KW - Cost-effectiveness analysis
KW - Global mental health
KW - Implementation science
KW - Peer support
KW - Pragmatic randomised controlled trial
KW - Process evaluation
KW - Severe mental illness
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85084403296&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s13063-020-4177-7
DO - 10.1186/s13063-020-4177-7
M3 - Article
C2 - 32357903
AN - SCOPUS:85084403296
SN - 1745-6215
VL - 21
JO - Trials
JF - Trials
IS - 1
M1 - 371
ER -