Placing Property: Theorizing the Urban from Settler Colonial Cities

Naama Blatman-Thomas, Libby Porter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

80 Scopus citations

Abstract

In the conspicuously geographical debate between ‘North’ and ‘South’ urbanism, settler colonial cities remain displaced. They are located in the ‘North’ but embody ‘South-like’ colonial dynamics and are hence neither colonial nor postcolonial. Heeding the call to theorize from ‘any city’, this article aims to contribute to a more systematic theorization of the urban from settler colonial cities. In it we focus on the work property does to materialize the settler colonial city and its specific relations of power. We identify three faces of property—as object, as redress and as land—and use case vignettes from Israel/Palestine and Australia to consider how each register continues to inform the functioning of settler colonial cities. We find that, through property, dispossession and settlement are continuously performed and creatively enacted. At the same time, the performance of property reaffirms the endurance of Indigenous land systems amid ongoing colonization. The article makes a contribution to contemporary debates in urban studies about the importance of surfacing the specificities of urban experiences around the world, while further unsettling the dissociative nature of urban property.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)30-45
Number of pages16
JournalInternational Journal of Urban and Regional Research
Volume43
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2019
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Australia
  • Israel/Palestine
  • comparative urbanism
  • land
  • property
  • settler colonial cities

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Development
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Urban Studies

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Placing Property: Theorizing the Urban from Settler Colonial Cities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this