TY - JOUR
T1 - Potential orofacial hazards of resistance training
T2 - A controlled comparative study *
AU - Friedman Rubin, Pessia
AU - Eli, Ilana
AU - Greenbaum, Tzvi
AU - Shapira, Keren
AU - Emodi-Perelman, Alona
AU - Winocur, Ephraim
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, © 2019 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2019/1/2
Y1 - 2019/1/2
N2 - Objective: To evaluate the effect of resistance training (RT) regarding potential hazard for dental wear, tooth abfractions, temporomandibular joint disc displacement, limitation in mouth opening, and existence of cervical spine disorders. The initial study hypothesis was that extensive resistance trainees (ExRT) would suffer from the above-mentioned symptoms more often than recreational trainees (RcT). Methods: A controlled comparative study among male gym members via questionnaires and a clinical examination. Results: ExRT had a higher prevalence of teeth indentations on the tongue (26% vs. 2% p < 0.001) and a higher prevalence of tooth abfractions than RcT (28% vs. 4% p < 0.005). ExRT exhibited a higher prevalence of cervical movement limitations (p < 0.05) and inadequate posture (p < 0.001). Conclusion: RT by itself may not be a risk factor for disc displacement. Nevertheless, it may act as a potential risk factor for irreversible hard tooth tissue damage and contribute to neck postural and mobility impairments.
AB - Objective: To evaluate the effect of resistance training (RT) regarding potential hazard for dental wear, tooth abfractions, temporomandibular joint disc displacement, limitation in mouth opening, and existence of cervical spine disorders. The initial study hypothesis was that extensive resistance trainees (ExRT) would suffer from the above-mentioned symptoms more often than recreational trainees (RcT). Methods: A controlled comparative study among male gym members via questionnaires and a clinical examination. Results: ExRT had a higher prevalence of teeth indentations on the tongue (26% vs. 2% p < 0.001) and a higher prevalence of tooth abfractions than RcT (28% vs. 4% p < 0.005). ExRT exhibited a higher prevalence of cervical movement limitations (p < 0.05) and inadequate posture (p < 0.001). Conclusion: RT by itself may not be a risk factor for disc displacement. Nevertheless, it may act as a potential risk factor for irreversible hard tooth tissue damage and contribute to neck postural and mobility impairments.
KW - Tooth abfractions
KW - bruxism
KW - cervical posture
KW - resistance training
KW - temporomandibular disorders
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85029444653&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/08869634.2017.1370566
DO - 10.1080/08869634.2017.1370566
M3 - Article
C2 - 28876194
AN - SCOPUS:85029444653
SN - 0886-9634
VL - 37
SP - 45
EP - 52
JO - Cranio - Journal of Craniomandibular Practice
JF - Cranio - Journal of Craniomandibular Practice
IS - 1
ER -