Precaution under mixed uncertainty: Implications for environmental management

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

17 Scopus citations


A model of pollution control subject to two types of uncertainty is presented. First, the natural decay of the pollution stock follows stochastic dynamics that drives a diffusion pollution process (" stochastic uncertainty" ). Moreover, the damage coefficient which determines the amount of damage corresponding to each pollution stock can undergo an abrupt increase at some uncertain future time (" event uncertainty" ). The model admits an explicit and simple dynamic characterization of the optimal emission rule and the ensuing pollution process. When only one type of uncertainty is permitted (by setting either the variance of the stochastic process or the hazard rate for the damage increase to zero) it acts to promote the intuitive response of precaution. However, allowing the two types to interact gives rise to a non-monotonic behavior, whereby increasing the stochastic variance first enhances, then diminishes the response to the hazard. The results confirm and expand recent findings based on discrete-time formulations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)188-197
Number of pages10
JournalResource and Energy Economics
Issue number2
StatePublished - 1 May 2012


  • Environmental pollution
  • Optimal management
  • Regime shifts
  • Stochastic control
  • Uncertainty

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics and Econometrics


Dive into the research topics of 'Precaution under mixed uncertainty: Implications for environmental management'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this