TY - JOUR
T1 - Precision medicine to diagnose asthma in preschool children
T2 - comparison of clinical scores, lung function, biomarkers, and genetic tests
AU - Castro-Rodriguez, Jose A.
AU - Nino, Gustavo
AU - Tal, Asher
AU - Forno, Erick
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2025/1/1
Y1 - 2025/1/1
N2 - Asthma is an umbrella term for several phenotypes and endotypes. It most frequently begins before the age of 6, with significant morbidity and decline in lung function occurring among all pediatric age groups. A delay in the diagnosis of asthma in preschoolers is associated with more severe exacerbations. One problem clinicians face is how to diagnose asthma early in its course; epidemiological phenotypes (i.e., transient, persistent, late-onset, and mid-childhood remitting wheeze) can only be ascertained retrospectively, and clinical phenotypes (e.g., episodic viral and multi-trigger wheeze) suffer from high variability and no relation with underlying pathological airway markers. International guidelines recommend that lung function tests and biomarkers be performed before diagnosing asthma in children under 5 years old. However, spirometry and airway resistance measures are typically normal in most preschoolers with asthma, and blood eosinophil counts, the most reliable biomarker for inhaled corticosteroid therapy, vary widely over time. Clinical predictive indices can help in predicting and diagnosing asthma in preschoolers. At least eight clinical predictive indices have been published, and four have been validated (API, PIAMA, APT, and PARS). Here, we will review the challenges of diagnosing asthma in the preschool age, the utility of several clinical indices, and the usefulness of incorporating biomarkers such as volatile organic components, exhaled breath condensate, and gene expression. Finally, we will discuss existing gaps and future directions for research in the field.
AB - Asthma is an umbrella term for several phenotypes and endotypes. It most frequently begins before the age of 6, with significant morbidity and decline in lung function occurring among all pediatric age groups. A delay in the diagnosis of asthma in preschoolers is associated with more severe exacerbations. One problem clinicians face is how to diagnose asthma early in its course; epidemiological phenotypes (i.e., transient, persistent, late-onset, and mid-childhood remitting wheeze) can only be ascertained retrospectively, and clinical phenotypes (e.g., episodic viral and multi-trigger wheeze) suffer from high variability and no relation with underlying pathological airway markers. International guidelines recommend that lung function tests and biomarkers be performed before diagnosing asthma in children under 5 years old. However, spirometry and airway resistance measures are typically normal in most preschoolers with asthma, and blood eosinophil counts, the most reliable biomarker for inhaled corticosteroid therapy, vary widely over time. Clinical predictive indices can help in predicting and diagnosing asthma in preschoolers. At least eight clinical predictive indices have been published, and four have been validated (API, PIAMA, APT, and PARS). Here, we will review the challenges of diagnosing asthma in the preschool age, the utility of several clinical indices, and the usefulness of incorporating biomarkers such as volatile organic components, exhaled breath condensate, and gene expression. Finally, we will discuss existing gaps and future directions for research in the field.
KW - Asthma
KW - Biomarkers
KW - Clinical predictive indices
KW - Epigenetic
KW - Genetic
KW - Lung function
KW - Preschool
KW - Recurrent wheezing
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105017810506
U2 - 10.1016/j.prrv.2025.09.001
DO - 10.1016/j.prrv.2025.09.001
M3 - Review article
C2 - 41047307
AN - SCOPUS:105017810506
SN - 1526-0542
JO - Paediatric Respiratory Reviews
JF - Paediatric Respiratory Reviews
ER -