TY - JOUR
T1 - Predation pressure in maize across Europe and in Argentina
T2 - an intercontinental comparison
AU - Ferrante, Marco
AU - Lövei, Gábor L.
AU - Magagnoli, Serena
AU - Minarcikova, Lenka
AU - Tomescu, Elena Larisa
AU - Burgio, Giovanni
AU - Cagan, Ludovit
AU - Ichim, Mihael Cristin
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank G. Barone, E. Bozóné-Borbáth, D. Di Grumo, M. Kiss, A. Lo Cacciato, A. Mansion-Vaquié, D. Nagy, N. Patelli, and U. Pilegård Larsen in Denmark, A. Andrei, R.M. Ciubotaru, E.R. Irimia, M.O. Popa, A. Rosca, E.A. Sicora and P.P. Sosoi in Romania, G. Aguilera, J.B. Beltrami, L.N. Cura, F. Fava, J. Finello, J.I. Leguizamos, G. Rojo, and N.F. Somale, in Argentina for technical assistance in the field and the laboratory, E. Trumper and J. Edelstein (†) for support, and two anonymous reviewers for comments on the manuscript. This is output no. 21 of the AMIGA Project, supported by the EC (grant agreement No. 289706) and is in partial fulfillment of the PhD requirements at Aarhus University (MF). MCI and ELT acknowledge cofunding from the Romanian Executive Unit for Financing Higher Education, Research, Development and Innovation under PNCDI II/Capacities Program/Module III (contract no. 199EU); LM and LC acknowledge partial funding from the Slovak Scientific Agency VEGA (Grant No. 1/0732/14). Author contributions: experimental design MF & GL; field work by all authors at their respective field sites, identification of predation marks MF, GL, SM, data evaluation, MF & GL, writing MF & GL, with input from all authors. Author sequence is according the “sequence by merit” principle.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences
PY - 2019/6/1
Y1 - 2019/6/1
N2 - Humankind draws important benefits from large-scale ecological processes termed ecosystem services, yet the status of several of them is declining. Reliable monitoring methods are essential for tracking the status of ecosystem services. Predation is the mainstay of natural pest control, a key ecosystem service. We used green plasticine caterpillars to monitor predation pressure, and to obtain baseline data on predator activity in transgenic Bt versus non-Bt maize fields in Old and New World countries. Predation pressure was measured at ground and canopy levels using an identical, small-plot experimental design in four European countries (Denmark, Slovakia, Romania and Italy) and Argentina. Total predation rate in maize was 11.7%d −1 (min. 7.2%d −1 in Argentina, max. 29.0%d −1 in Romania). Artificial caterpillars were attacked both by invertebrates (mostly chewing insects with 42.0% of the attack marks, and ants with 7.1%, but also predatory and parasitoid wasps, spiders and slugs), and vertebrates (small mammals 25.5%, and birds 20.2%). Total predation at ground level (15.7%d −1 ) was significantly higher than in maize canopies (6.0%d −1 ) in all countries, except Argentina. We found no significant differences between predator pressure in Bt versus non-Bt maize plots. The artificial caterpillar method provided comparable, quantitative data on predation intensity, and proved to be suitable for monitoring natural pest control. This method usefully expands the existing toolkit by directly measuring ecological function rather than structure.
AB - Humankind draws important benefits from large-scale ecological processes termed ecosystem services, yet the status of several of them is declining. Reliable monitoring methods are essential for tracking the status of ecosystem services. Predation is the mainstay of natural pest control, a key ecosystem service. We used green plasticine caterpillars to monitor predation pressure, and to obtain baseline data on predator activity in transgenic Bt versus non-Bt maize fields in Old and New World countries. Predation pressure was measured at ground and canopy levels using an identical, small-plot experimental design in four European countries (Denmark, Slovakia, Romania and Italy) and Argentina. Total predation rate in maize was 11.7%d −1 (min. 7.2%d −1 in Argentina, max. 29.0%d −1 in Romania). Artificial caterpillars were attacked both by invertebrates (mostly chewing insects with 42.0% of the attack marks, and ants with 7.1%, but also predatory and parasitoid wasps, spiders and slugs), and vertebrates (small mammals 25.5%, and birds 20.2%). Total predation at ground level (15.7%d −1 ) was significantly higher than in maize canopies (6.0%d −1 ) in all countries, except Argentina. We found no significant differences between predator pressure in Bt versus non-Bt maize plots. The artificial caterpillar method provided comparable, quantitative data on predation intensity, and proved to be suitable for monitoring natural pest control. This method usefully expands the existing toolkit by directly measuring ecological function rather than structure.
KW - artificial caterpillars
KW - ecosystem services
KW - mortality
KW - sentinel prey
KW - transgenic plants
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85039039596&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/1744-7917.12550
DO - 10.1111/1744-7917.12550
M3 - Article
C2 - 29090867
AN - SCOPUS:85039039596
SN - 1672-9609
VL - 26
SP - 545
EP - 554
JO - Insect Science
JF - Insect Science
IS - 3
ER -