TY - JOUR
T1 - Preparing for genocide
T2 - Quasi-experimental evidence from Rwanda
AU - Bonnier, Evelina
AU - Poulsen, Jonas
AU - Rogall, Thorsten
AU - Stryjan, Miri
N1 - Funding Information:
We especially thank Marijke Verpoorten and David Yanagizawa-Drott for kindly sharing their data with us, and Felix Rubogora for valuable assistance with media search. We are grateful to the editor Andrew Foster and to a number of anonymous referees for very constructive comments. This paper has benefited from valuable input from Eli Berman, Martina Björkman Nyqvist, Benjamin Crost, Tom Cunningham, Gordon Dahl, Melissa Dell, Oeindrila Dube, Willa Friedman, Matt Gentzkow, Paola Giuliano, Jonas Hjort, Chang-Tai Hsieh, Saumitra Jha, Juanna Joensen, Magnus Johannesson, Todd Kaplan, Erik Lindqvist, Andreas Madestam, Eva Mörk, Suresh Naidu, Nathan Nunn, Torsten Persson, Cristian Pop-Eleches, Marit Rehavi, Jacob Shapiro, Jesse Shapiro, David Strömberg, Jakob Svensson, Francesco Trebbi, Erik Verhoogen, Miguel Urquiola, and David Yanagizawa-Drott, as well as seminar participants at Harvard, UCSD, Columbia, Tel-Aviv University, ESOC, ASWEDE, SSE, IIES, NEUDC, EIEF, and the Annual Bank Conference on Africa. Financial support from Handelsbanken's Research Foundations is gratefully acknowledged.
Funding Information:
We especially thank Marijke Verpoorten and David Yanagizawa-Drott for kindly sharing their data with us, and Felix Rubogora for valuable assistance with media search. We are grateful to the editor Andrew Foster and to a number of anonymous referees for very constructive comments. This paper has benefited from valuable input from Eli Berman, Martina Björkman Nyqvist, Benjamin Crost, Tom Cunningham, Gordon Dahl, Melissa Dell, Oeindrila Dube, Willa Friedman, Matt Gentzkow, Paola Giuliano, Jonas Hjort, Chang-Tai Hsieh, Saumitra Jha, Juanna Joensen, Magnus Johannesson, Todd Kaplan, Erik Lindqvist, Andreas Madestam, Eva Mörk, Suresh Naidu, Nathan Nunn, Torsten Persson, Cristian Pop-Eleches, Marit Rehavi, Jacob Shapiro, Jesse Shapiro, David Strömberg, Jakob Svensson, Francesco Trebbi, Erik Verhoogen, Miguel Urquiola, and David Yanagizawa-Drott, as well as seminar participants at Harvard, UCSD, Columbia, Tel-Aviv University, ESOC, ASWEDE, SSE, IIES, NEUDC, EIEF, and the Annual Bank Conference on Africa. Financial support from Handelsbanken's Research Foundations is gratefully acknowledged.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020
PY - 2020/11/1
Y1 - 2020/11/1
N2 - This paper shows how state-controlled community meetings can facilitate large-scale mobilization of civilians into violence. We analyze a Rwandan community program that required citizens to participate in community work and political meetings every Saturday in the years before the 1994 genocide. We exploit cross-sectional variation in meeting intensity induced by exogenous weather fluctuations, and find that a one standard-deviation increase in the number of rainy Saturdays before the genocide decreased civilian violence by 17 percent. We find evidence that the meetings provided an arena for local elites to spread propaganda and bring people together. In research and policy, community meetings are often treated as positive, community building forces. Our results indicate that they can also lead to negative outcomes. This should, however, not suggest that such meetings are inherently destructive. Instead, community meetings should be understood as powerful tools and their effects depend on the political intention of the leaders.
AB - This paper shows how state-controlled community meetings can facilitate large-scale mobilization of civilians into violence. We analyze a Rwandan community program that required citizens to participate in community work and political meetings every Saturday in the years before the 1994 genocide. We exploit cross-sectional variation in meeting intensity induced by exogenous weather fluctuations, and find that a one standard-deviation increase in the number of rainy Saturdays before the genocide decreased civilian violence by 17 percent. We find evidence that the meetings provided an arena for local elites to spread propaganda and bring people together. In research and policy, community meetings are often treated as positive, community building forces. Our results indicate that they can also lead to negative outcomes. This should, however, not suggest that such meetings are inherently destructive. Instead, community meetings should be understood as powerful tools and their effects depend on the political intention of the leaders.
KW - Collective action
KW - Community meetings
KW - Conflict
KW - Genocide
KW - Industrial organization of conflict
KW - Political elites
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85090355161&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2020.102533
DO - 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2020.102533
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85090355161
SN - 0304-3878
VL - 147
JO - Journal of Development Economics
JF - Journal of Development Economics
M1 - 102533
ER -