TY - JOUR
T1 - Preserving ‘the Enemy’s’ architecture
T2 - preservation and gentrification in a formerly Palestinian Jerusalem neighbourhood
AU - Zaban, Hila
N1 - Funding Information:
I would like to thank Prof Jackie Feldman and Prof Haim Yacobi for their guidance during the research. I am grateful for doctoral and postdoctoral funding from Ben Gurion University, the Israel Institute and the Leverhulme Trust, without which this article could not have been written. I am also deeply grateful to Dr Moriel Ram, Dr Chiara de Cesari, Dr Rozita Dimova, four anonymous reviewers and the editor, Prof Laurajane Smith, for their valuable comments and suggestions.
Funding Information:
This work was supported by the Israel Institute [grant number 10038]; the Leverhulme Trust [grant number ECF-2016-763].
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Hila Zaban. Published with licence by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2017/11/26
Y1 - 2017/11/26
N2 - This article relates to the preservation of Palestinian buildings in Jerusalem and raises the question why state-sanctioned institutions act to preserve Palestinian architecture built pre-1948, bearing in mind the context of a difficult past and an on-going conflict? The article addresses the manner in which Jerusalem’s authorised heritage discourse focuses only on preserving Palestinian buildings’ tangible aspects (architectural styles), and not on intangible aspects such as the narrative of their builders. The main argument is that while preservation is presented as a civilised practice, it is driven by the commodification of the buildings and sites and their valued ‘authenticity’. The common practice is to ‘preserve’ these buildings by developing them to create more housing units. This practice inevitably leads to gentrification. Moreover, even when intangible aspects of heritage are pushed aside, preserving these buildings comes with the ‘risk’ of them being used as memory sites for subaltern groups. The article focuses on one formerly Palestinian West Jerusalem neighbourhood, Baka, where gentrification was triggered by historic Palestinian homes and where the neighbourhood’s development continues to be linked with historic preservation.
AB - This article relates to the preservation of Palestinian buildings in Jerusalem and raises the question why state-sanctioned institutions act to preserve Palestinian architecture built pre-1948, bearing in mind the context of a difficult past and an on-going conflict? The article addresses the manner in which Jerusalem’s authorised heritage discourse focuses only on preserving Palestinian buildings’ tangible aspects (architectural styles), and not on intangible aspects such as the narrative of their builders. The main argument is that while preservation is presented as a civilised practice, it is driven by the commodification of the buildings and sites and their valued ‘authenticity’. The common practice is to ‘preserve’ these buildings by developing them to create more housing units. This practice inevitably leads to gentrification. Moreover, even when intangible aspects of heritage are pushed aside, preserving these buildings comes with the ‘risk’ of them being used as memory sites for subaltern groups. The article focuses on one formerly Palestinian West Jerusalem neighbourhood, Baka, where gentrification was triggered by historic Palestinian homes and where the neighbourhood’s development continues to be linked with historic preservation.
KW - Gentrification
KW - Israel
KW - Jerusalem
KW - Palestinian architecture
KW - conflict
KW - historic preservation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85028829943&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/13527258.2017.1362576
DO - 10.1080/13527258.2017.1362576
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85028829943
VL - 23
SP - 961
EP - 976
JO - International Journal of Heritage Studies
JF - International Journal of Heritage Studies
SN - 1352-7258
IS - 10
ER -