Prevalence and incidence of osteoarthritis: A population‐based retrospective cohort study

Rola Hamood, Matanya Tirosh, Noga Fallach, Gabriel Chodick, Elon Eisenberg, Omri Lubovsky

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    33 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    While trends data of osteoarthritis (OA) are accumulating, primarily from Western Europe and the US, a gap persists in the knowledge of OA epidemiology in Middle Eastern populations. This study aimed to explore the prevalence, incidence, correlations, and temporal trends of OA in Israel during 2013–2018, using a nationally representative primary care database. On 31 December 2018, a total of 180,126 OA patients were identified, representing a point prevalence of 115.3 per 1000 persons (95% CI, 114.8–115.8 per 1000 persons). Geographically, OA prevalence was not uniformly distributed, with the Southern and Northern peripheral districts having a higher prevalence than the rest of the Israeli regions. OA incidence increased over time from 7.36 per 1000 persons (95% CI 6.21–7.50 per 1000 persons) in 2013 to 8.23 per 1000 persons (95% CI 8.09–8.38 per 1000 persons) in 2017 (p‐value for trend = 0.02). The incidence was lowest in patients under 60 years (in both sexes) and peaked at 60–70 years. In older ages, the incidence leveled off in men and declined in women. The growing risk of OA warrants a greater attention to timely preventive and therapeutic interventions. Further population‐based studies in the Middle East are needed to identify modifiable risk factors for timely preventive and therapeutic interventions.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article number4282
    JournalJournal of Clinical Medicine
    Volume10
    Issue number18
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 1 Sep 2021

    Keywords

    • Incidence
    • Middle east
    • Osteoarthritis
    • Prevalence
    • Trends

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • General Medicine

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Prevalence and incidence of osteoarthritis: A population‐based retrospective cohort study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this