Abstract
To what extent and in what ways should researchers share their views with research participants during ethnographic fieldwork? This article discusses the author's experience of adopting different communicative stances with respondents in the context of an ethnographic study of the enactment of the English National Literacy Strategy in a 'failing' primary school. A commonly accepted communicative stance in ethnography, according to which the researcher avoids disclosure of his or her own views, is problematised; and the potential advantages and disadvantages of feedback as a research tool are explored.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 81-96 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | Ethnography and Education |
| Volume | 5 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Mar 2010 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Communicative stance
- Ethnographic fieldwork
- Participatory research
- Reflexivity
- Researcher-respondent relations
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Gender Studies
- Cultural Studies
- Education
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Problematising researcher-respondent relations through an exploration of communicative stance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver