Prognosis of patients with carotid blowout syndrome in the era of endovascular interventions

  • Aiman Elmograbi
  • , Nir Tsur
  • , Yonatan Reuven
  • , Eyal Yosefof
  • , Eli Perlow
  • , Thomas Shpitzer
  • , Esmat Najjar
  • , Gideon Bachar
  • , Aron Popovtzer
  • , Aviram Mizrachi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective. To analyse the prognosis of carotid blowout syndrome (CBS) after endovascular interventions in patients with head and neck cancer. Methods. We conducted a retrospective study at a tertiary centre (2000-2019), including demo-graphics, medical history, treatment details, and outcomes of CBS. Results. Among 44 patients with CBS (32 males, 12 females; mean age 65 ± 14 years), squamous cell carcinoma histotype and laryngeal localisation were most common, with 84% having advanced-staged disease. Significant risk factors included prior surgery (70%), neck dissection (48%), radiation (55%), and chemotherapy (66%). Pharyngocutaneous fistula and tracheostomy were present in 32% and 57% of cases, respectively. Radiological findings showed threatened bleeding (62%), sentinel bleeding (11%), and acute rupture (27%). Endovascular treatment achieved haemostasis in 95% of cases, with an 11% rate of acute ischaemic complications. Six-month survival was 28%, with 66% of deaths due to disease progression. Recurrent bleeding occurred in 16% of cases. Conclusions. CBS is a severe complication with a high risk of rebleeding. Endovascular interventions effectively manage bleeding with low rates of com-plication.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)380-387
Number of pages8
JournalActa Otorhinolaryngologica Italica
Volume45
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Dec 2025
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • carotid artery blowout syndrome
  • endovascular treatment
  • head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Prognosis of patients with carotid blowout syndrome in the era of endovascular interventions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this