Proportional ranking in primary elections: A case study

Ariel Rosenfeld, Ehud Shapiro, Nimrod Talmon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Many democratic political parties hold primary elections, which nicely reflects their democratic nature and promote, among other things, the democratic value of inclusiveness. However, the methods currently used for holding such primary elections may not be the most suitable, especially if some form of proportional ranking is desired. In this paper, we compare different algorithmic methods for holding primaries (i.e., different aggregation methods for voters’ ballots) by evaluating the degree of proportional ranking that is achieved by each of them using real-world data. In particular, we compare six different algorithms by analyzing real-world data from a recent primary election conducted by the Israeli Democratit party. Technically, we analyze unique voter data and evaluate the proportionality achieved by means of cluster analysis, aiming at pinpointing the representation that is granted to different voter groups under each of the algorithmic methods considered. Our finding suggest that, contrary to the most-prominent primaries algorithm used (i.e., Approval), other methods such as Sequential Proportional Approval or Phragmen can bring about better proportional ranking and thus may be better suited for primary elections in practice.

Original languageEnglish
JournalParty Politics
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 1 Jan 2022

Keywords

  • Primary elections
  • case study
  • proportional ranking
  • representation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Proportional ranking in primary elections: A case study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this