Psychological Research and the Epistemological Approach to Argumentation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Much psychological research on argumentation focuses on persuasion and pragmatics. However, one strand investigates how average people understand the nature of knowledge and knowing, and how these epistemological orientations underlie skilled argumentation. The research reviewed addresses the question whether the normative emphasis of the philosophical epistemological approach to argumentation matches psychological findings. The empirical research reviewed concerns the relationship between personal epistemological understanding and three aspects of argument: argument construction, identification of informal reasoning fallacies, and orientation toward explanation or evidence. Findings suggest that people develop an epistemological approach toward argumentation in which beliefs about knowledge justification requirements are related with skilled argumentation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)103-120
Number of pages18
JournalInformal Logic
Volume26
Issue number1
StatePublished - 1 Dec 2006

Keywords

  • ARGUMENTATION
  • EPISTEMOLOGY
  • FALLACY
  • INFORMAL LOGIC
  • LOGIC

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Psychological Research and the Epistemological Approach to Argumentation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this