TY - JOUR
T1 - Psychometric Characteristics of the Hebrew Version of the Professional Quality-of-Life Scale
AU - Samson, Tali
AU - Iecovich, Esther
AU - Shvartzman, Pesach
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine
PY - 2016/10/1
Y1 - 2016/10/1
N2 - Context Exposure to human suffering may have ramifications for the professional quality of life (ProQol) of palliative care teams. The ProQol scale was designed to assess both negative and positive work-related outcomes and has been used recently for the evaluation of work-related outcomes among palliative care workers. However, the assessment of ProQol among Israeli hospice workers is scant. Objectives The aim of this study was to assess the psychometric properties and the factor structure of the Hebrew version of the 30-item ProQol questionnaire. Methods The study population included 1100 health care providers including physicians, nurses, and social workers in primary health care and palliative care settings. Result A total of 380 workers participated in the study, representing a response rate of 34.5%. The confirmatory factor analysis did not show an adequate “goodness to fit.” Using a factor coefficient of 0.35 or greater for inclusion, the exploratory factor analysis revealed a 23-item solution, loaded onto three factors: compassion satisfaction, secondary traumatic stress, and burnout (BU). The internal consistency subscales were 0.87, 0.82, and 0.69, respectively. The subscales showed good convergent and exploratory validity because of significant correlations with measures that examine BU, work engagement, and peritraumatic dissociative experiences. Conclusions Although the findings are consistent with those from studies in other languages, they are different from the original 30-item three-factor structure reported by Stamm. The Hebrew version of the compassion satisfaction subscale was found to be reliable and valid for studies among health care professionals, but further research is needed to improve the BU and secondary traumatic stress subscales.
AB - Context Exposure to human suffering may have ramifications for the professional quality of life (ProQol) of palliative care teams. The ProQol scale was designed to assess both negative and positive work-related outcomes and has been used recently for the evaluation of work-related outcomes among palliative care workers. However, the assessment of ProQol among Israeli hospice workers is scant. Objectives The aim of this study was to assess the psychometric properties and the factor structure of the Hebrew version of the 30-item ProQol questionnaire. Methods The study population included 1100 health care providers including physicians, nurses, and social workers in primary health care and palliative care settings. Result A total of 380 workers participated in the study, representing a response rate of 34.5%. The confirmatory factor analysis did not show an adequate “goodness to fit.” Using a factor coefficient of 0.35 or greater for inclusion, the exploratory factor analysis revealed a 23-item solution, loaded onto three factors: compassion satisfaction, secondary traumatic stress, and burnout (BU). The internal consistency subscales were 0.87, 0.82, and 0.69, respectively. The subscales showed good convergent and exploratory validity because of significant correlations with measures that examine BU, work engagement, and peritraumatic dissociative experiences. Conclusions Although the findings are consistent with those from studies in other languages, they are different from the original 30-item three-factor structure reported by Stamm. The Hebrew version of the compassion satisfaction subscale was found to be reliable and valid for studies among health care professionals, but further research is needed to improve the BU and secondary traumatic stress subscales.
KW - ProQol
KW - palliative care
KW - professional quality of life
KW - reliability
KW - validity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84994493664&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.03.019
DO - 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.03.019
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84994493664
SN - 0885-3924
VL - 52
SP - 575-581.e1
JO - Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
JF - Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
IS - 4
ER -