Quantifying the future value of cacheable food using fox squirrels (sciurus niger)

Marius Van Der Merwe, Joel S. Brown, Burt P. Kotler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Food caching allows foraging decisions to include both present and future food value. We developed and tested a conceptual framework for measuring animals perceptions of future vs. present food value. Fox squirrels (Sciurus niger) are well-known caching animals in North America. We measured giving-up densities (GUDs) of fox squirrels to test the following hypotheses: (1) all else equal, animals should prefer cacheable to non-cacheable foods, and (2) the option value of a cacheable food should change seasonally and be highest preceding lean periods. We presented squirrels with experimental food patches containing either shelled hazelnuts, hazelnuts with their shells intact (to affect cacheability) or both kinds. Our data support both hypotheses. Squirrels exploited food patches with cacheable nuts more thoroughly and left them at lower GUDs. The squirrels perception of the future value of hazelnuts with their shells intact was found to be 32% higher than their present value. GUDs also varied by season, fall > spring >winter > summer, likely corresponding to food availability. Season and food cacheability interacted to further determine GUDs. The difference in GUDs between cacheable and non-cacheable nuts varied similarly: fall > spring > winter > summer, likely corresponding to changing food availability, reproductive opportunities and pending energetic shortfalls.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-10
Number of pages10
JournalIsrael Journal of Ecology and Evolution
Volume60
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2014

Keywords

  • GUDs
  • food caching
  • foraging ecology
  • fox squirrels
  • future food value
  • giving-up-densities

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Quantifying the future value of cacheable food using fox squirrels (sciurus niger)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this