Quenching by sodium thiosulfate does not influence 16S rRNA gene sequencing profiles of reclaimed water from three sites in the Mid-Atlantic, United States

Sarah M. Allard, Sultana Solaiman, Mary Theresa Callahan, Anthony Bui, Hillary Craddock, Joseph Haymaker, Derek Foust, Rico Duncan, Eoghan Smyth, Emmanuel F. Mongodin, Fawzy Hashem, Eric May, Shirley A. Micallef, Amy R. Sapkota

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

A quenching agent is commonly added to chlorinated, reclaimed water during sample collection to prevent chlorine-mediated die-off of viable microbiota. However, the effect of quenching on downstream 16S rRNA-based bacterial community analyses is unclear. We conducted a side-by-side comparison of 16S rRNA sequencing data from reclaimed water samples quenched with sodium thiosulfate and non-quenched samples. Our data showed that 16 S rRNA processing and sequencing methods, and resulting bacterial profiles, were not negatively impacted by quenching.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)296-300
Number of pages5
JournalEnvironmental Research
Volume172
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 May 2019
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • 16S rRNA
  • Quenching
  • Reclaimed water
  • Sodium thiosulfate
  • Water microbiome

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry
  • General Environmental Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Quenching by sodium thiosulfate does not influence 16S rRNA gene sequencing profiles of reclaimed water from three sites in the Mid-Atlantic, United States'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this