Abstract
Firms may exploit the option of choosing among different rating agencies in order to pick the highest rating offered. This possibility, known as rating shopping, is relatively limited on the US corporate bond market because the two main rating agencies (S&P and Moody's) rate virtually all large bond issuers. In this study, we use the data on corporate bond ratings assigned by two Israeli rating agencies affiliated with S&P and Moody's during the period 2004-2012. We show that while one agency (Midroog) systematically assigned higher ratings, the ratings of the other agency (S&P-Maalot) were inflated due to rating shopping. However, despite the many features that encourage rating inflation, the resulting distortion was relatively small (one notch). This may be a fair price for maintaining a competitive rating industry.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 270-280 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | International Review of Financial Analysis |
Volume | 33 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 1 Jan 2014 |
Keywords
- Corporate bonds
- Credit ratings
- Rating agencies
- Rating inflation
- Rating shopping
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Finance
- Economics and Econometrics