Rationale and design of the randomized prospective ATLAS study: Avoid Transvenous Leads in Appropriate Subjects

Blandine Mondésert, Jamil Bashir, François Philippon, Marc Dubuc, Guy Amit, Derek Exner, Jacqueline Joza, David H. Birnie, Chris Lane, Bernice Tsang, Victoria Korley, Danna Spears, Andrea Ling, Angie Djuric, Eugene Crystal, Tom Hruczkowski, Jean François Roux, Sandra Carroll, Vidal Essebag, Andrew D. KrahnJeff S. Healey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

15 Scopus citations


Background: The defibrillator lead is the weakest part of the transvenous (TV) implantable cardioverter defibrillation (ICD) system and a frequent cause of morbidity. Lead dislodgement, cardiac perforation, insertion-related trauma including pneumothorax and vascular injury, are common early complications of TV-ICD implantation. Venous occlusion, tricuspid valve dysfunction, lead fracture and lead insulation failure are additional, later complications. The introduction of a totally sub-cutaneous ICD (S-ICD) may reduce these lead-related issues, patient morbidity, hospitalizations and costs. However, such benefits compared to the TV-ICD have not been demonstrated in a randomized trial. Design: ATLAS (Avoid Transvenous Leads in Appropriate Subjects) is a multi-centered, randomized, open-label, parallel group trial. Patients younger than 60 years are eligible. If older than 60 years, patients are eligible if they have an inherited heart rhythm disease, or risk factors for ICD-related complication, such as hemodialysis, a history of ICD or pacemaker infection, heart valve replacement, or severe pulmonary disease. This study will determine if using an S-ICD compared to a TV-ICD reduces a primary composite outcome of perioperative complications including pulmonary or pericardial perforation, lead dislodgement or dysfunction, tricuspid regurgitation and ipsilateral venous thrombosis. Five hundred patients will be enrolled from 14 Canadian hospitals, and data collected to both early- (at 6 months) and mid-term complications (at 24 months) as well as mortality and ICD shock efficacy. The ATLAS randomized trial is comparing early- and mid-term vascular and lead-related complications among S-ICD versus TV-ICD recipients who are younger or at higher risk of ICD-related complications.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-9
Number of pages9
JournalAmerican Heart Journal
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2019
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine


Dive into the research topics of 'Rationale and design of the randomized prospective ATLAS study: Avoid Transvenous Leads in Appropriate Subjects'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this