Reply to “Comments on ‘Harmonic and transient scattering from time varying obstacles’ ” [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 76, 1527-1534 (1984)]

D. Censor

doi:10.1121/1.393645

Reply to “Comments on ‘Harmonic and transient scattering from time varying obstacles’ ” [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 76, 1527-1534 (1984)]

D. Censor

Research output: Contribution to journal › Letter › peer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

The present reply to the above comments by Piquette and Van Buren [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 79, 179–180 (1986)] examines the legitimacy of the Doppler method for analysis of wave problems involving moving boundaries. Inasmuch as different results are predicted by Piquette and Van Buren, the ultimate test will have to be the experiment.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	181-182
Number of pages	2
Journal	Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Volume	79
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1121/1.393645
State	Published - 1 Jan 1986
Externally published	Yes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
Acoustics and Ultrasonics

Access to Document

10.1121/1.393645

Cite this

@article{a88f69da3d514e1a92f3e087dfb06972,

title = "Reply to “Comments on {\textquoteleft}Harmonic and transient scattering from time varying obstacles{\textquoteright} ” [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 76, 1527-1534 (1984)]",

abstract = "The present reply to the above comments by Piquette and Van Buren [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 79, 179–180 (1986)] examines the legitimacy of the Doppler method for analysis of wave problems involving moving boundaries. Inasmuch as different results are predicted by Piquette and Van Buren, the ultimate test will have to be the experiment.",

author = "D. Censor",

year = "1986",

month = jan,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1121/1.393645",

language = "English",

volume = "79",

pages = "181--182",

journal = "Journal of the Acoustical Society of America",

issn = "0001-4966",

publisher = "Acoustical Society of America",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reply to “Comments on ‘Harmonic and transient scattering from time varying obstacles’ ” [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 76, 1527-1534 (1984)]

AU - Censor, D.

PY - 1986/1/1

Y1 - 1986/1/1

N2 - The present reply to the above comments by Piquette and Van Buren [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 79, 179–180 (1986)] examines the legitimacy of the Doppler method for analysis of wave problems involving moving boundaries. Inasmuch as different results are predicted by Piquette and Van Buren, the ultimate test will have to be the experiment.

AB - The present reply to the above comments by Piquette and Van Buren [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 79, 179–180 (1986)] examines the legitimacy of the Doppler method for analysis of wave problems involving moving boundaries. Inasmuch as different results are predicted by Piquette and Van Buren, the ultimate test will have to be the experiment.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84882579623&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1121/1.393645

DO - 10.1121/1.393645

M3 - Letter

AN - SCOPUS:84882579623

SN - 0001-4966

VL - 79

SP - 181

EP - 182

JO - Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

JF - Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

IS - 1

ER -

Reply to “Comments on ‘Harmonic and transient scattering from time varying obstacles’ ” [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 76, 1527-1534 (1984)]

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this