Reply to 'Indication bias or protopathic bias?'

Sharon Daniel; Gideon Koren; Eitan Lunenfeld; Amalia Levy

doi:10.1111/bcp.12708

Reply to 'Indication bias or protopathic bias?'

Sharon Daniel, Gideon Koren, Eitan Lunenfeld, Amalia Levy

Research output: Contribution to journal › Letter › peer-review

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	781
Number of pages	1
Journal	British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Volume	80
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.12708
State	Published - 1 Oct 2015

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Pharmacology
Pharmacology (medical)

Access to Document

10.1111/bcp.12708

Cite this

@article{906fb6e0df4c44d1bf64d5d51cd6c08b,

title = "Reply to 'Indication bias or protopathic bias?'",

author = "Sharon Daniel and Gideon Koren and Eitan Lunenfeld and Amalia Levy",

year = "2015",

month = oct,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1111/bcp.12708",

language = "English",

volume = "80",

pages = "781",

journal = "British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology",

issn = "0306-5251",

publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reply to 'Indication bias or protopathic bias?'

AU - Daniel, Sharon

AU - Koren, Gideon

AU - Lunenfeld, Eitan

AU - Levy, Amalia

PY - 2015/10/1

Y1 - 2015/10/1

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84942550745&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/bcp.12708

DO - 10.1111/bcp.12708

M3 - Letter

AN - SCOPUS:84942550745

SN - 0306-5251

VL - 80

SP - 781

JO - British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology

JF - British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology

IS - 4

ER -

Reply to 'Indication bias or protopathic bias?'

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this