TY - JOUR
T1 - Research on professional organizations
T2 - A review of theoretical traditions, themes, methods and locations
AU - Brock, David M.
N1 - Funding Information:
Many thanks to Tracy Adams for her encouragement throughout this project; and to Swethaa Ballakrishnen, Daniel Muzio and Bob Nelson for their valuable input along the way.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Canadian Sociological Association/La Société canadienne de sociologie
PY - 2021/11/1
Y1 - 2021/11/1
N2 - This research note presents an overview of the contemporary “professional organization” research area. We begin with the historical roots and evolution of research into professionals and the organizations in which they work, identifying five theoretical traditions—namely sociology of organization, sociology of the professions, professional organization, professional service firms, and public professionalism. Reviewing recent research in these areas allows us to identify important research phenomena—such as hybridity, institutional work, internationalization, and professional identity—and to understand how the institutional view within the “sociology of the professions” tradition has become a dominant paradigm for this research. This review also reveals the extent to which various occupations, methodological approaches, and academic fields, and locations have assumed positions of importance in recent years. Finally, future directions relevant to sociology researchers are discussed.
AB - This research note presents an overview of the contemporary “professional organization” research area. We begin with the historical roots and evolution of research into professionals and the organizations in which they work, identifying five theoretical traditions—namely sociology of organization, sociology of the professions, professional organization, professional service firms, and public professionalism. Reviewing recent research in these areas allows us to identify important research phenomena—such as hybridity, institutional work, internationalization, and professional identity—and to understand how the institutional view within the “sociology of the professions” tradition has become a dominant paradigm for this research. This review also reveals the extent to which various occupations, methodological approaches, and academic fields, and locations have assumed positions of importance in recent years. Finally, future directions relevant to sociology researchers are discussed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85117336570&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/cars.12364
DO - 10.1111/cars.12364
M3 - Article
C2 - 34669266
AN - SCOPUS:85117336570
SN - 1755-6171
VL - 58
SP - 569
EP - 586
JO - Canadian Review of Sociology
JF - Canadian Review of Sociology
IS - 4
ER -