Resilience, sense of danger, and reporting in wartime: a cross-sectional study of healthcare personnel in a general hospital

Sarah Sberro-Cohen, Inbal Amit, Erez Barenboim, Alona Roitman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background and Aims: Maintaining healthcare services and ensuring the presence of healthcare personnel (HCP) during periods of conflict and high-intensity warfare in Israel including the significant security event that occurred on May 2021, pose significant challenges for hospitals in the range of missile attacks. The May 2021 event, marked by intense hostilities and military actions, brought about heightened security escalations and increased risks in the region. Despite the prevailing threat of missile attacks and ongoing security concerns, hospitals in the affected areas were required to sustain their services and uphold care standards. In light of these circumstances, this study aims to identify the factors that influence the percentage of HCP reporting for work during these intense periods of security escalations and wartime in Israel. Specifically, it explores the relationships between resilience, sense of danger, and HCP absenteeism in the context of the ongoing conflict. The findings of this study can provide valuable insights for designing interventions aimed at decreasing HCP absenteeism during security escalations, wartime, and emergency situations, ultimately contributing to the resilience and effectiveness of healthcare delivery in this challenging environment. Methods: During a relative calm period from December 2021 to January 2022, a cross-sectional study was conducted at a southern Israeli general hospital, situated within the range of missile attacks in the midst of a longstanding conflict. The study focused on HCP who were employed before May 21, which marked the end of the last war state at that time. The questionnaire, consisting of measures for resilience using the Conor-Davidson scale (CD-RISC 10) and the sense of danger assessed with the Solomon & Prager inventory, was administered online to all hospital employees at Assuta Ashdod Hospital, located in the southern city of Ashdod, Israel. This approach was chosen due to the challenging nature of conducting a study during an existing war, making it impractical to carry out the research during such periods of active war. Results: In total, 390 employees completed the survey (response rate of 24%). Of this sample, 77.4% reported fully to work during the last security escalations in May 2021. Most of the sample (84.1%) felt insecure on the way to work. The HCP who reported fully to work had a higher level of resilience than employees who reported partially or did not come to work at all (p =.03). A higher sense of danger in the workplace correlated with a 73% increase in absenteeism (p <.01). Absenteeism (partial or full) was higher among HCP with children who require supervision (p <.01). Hospital preparedness for emergencies as perceived by the employees increased HCP attendance at work (p =.03). Conclusions: Hospital management should consider designing programs aimed at potentially strengthening the level of resilience and fostering a greater sense of security among hospital personnel, which might encourage greater attendance at work during wartime, crises, or emergencies.

Original languageEnglish
Article number81
JournalHuman Resources for Health
Volume21
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Dec 2023
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Attendance at work
  • Resilience
  • Sense of danger
  • Wartime

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Administration
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Resilience, sense of danger, and reporting in wartime: a cross-sectional study of healthcare personnel in a general hospital'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this