Response to: 'Why medical professionals have no moral claim to conscientious objection accommodation in liberal democracies' by Schuklenk and Smalling

Shimon M. Glick, Alan Jotkowitz

Research output: Contribution to journalLetterpeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

The recent essay by Schuklenk and Smalling opposing respect for physicians' conscientious objections to providing patients with medical services that are legally permitted in liberal democracies is based on several erroneous assumptions. Acting in this manner would have serious harmful effects on the ethos of medicine and of bioethics. A much more nuanced and balanced position is critical in order to respect physicians' conscience with minimal damage to patients' rights.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)248-249
Number of pages2
JournalJournal of Medical Ethics
Volume43
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Apr 2017

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects
  • Health(social science)
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Health Policy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Response to: 'Why medical professionals have no moral claim to conscientious objection accommodation in liberal democracies' by Schuklenk and Smalling'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this