Resting Stroop task: Evidence of task conflict in trials with no required response

Ronen Hershman, Gal Dadon, Andrea Kiesel, Avishai Henik

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In the typical Stroop task, participants are presented with color words written in different ink colors and are asked to respond to their color. It has been suggested that the Stroop task consists of two main conflicts: information conflict (color vs. word naming) and task conflict (respond to color vs. read the word). In the current study, we developed a novel task that includes both Response trials (i.e., trials in which a response is required) and Rest trials (i.e., trials in which no response is required or available) and investigated the existence of both information and task conflicts in Rest trials. We found evidence for task conflict in Response and also in Rest trials, while evidence for information conflict was only observed in Response trials. These results are in line with a model of task conflict that occurs independently of and prior to information conflict in the Stroop task.

Original languageEnglish
JournalPsychonomic Bulletin and Review
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 1 Jan 2023

Keywords

  • Cognitive control
  • Informational conflict
  • Pupillometry
  • Stroop effect
  • Task conflict

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Resting Stroop task: Evidence of task conflict in trials with no required response'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this