Rethinking cost-effectiveness in the era of zero healthcare spending growth

Ronen Arbel, Dan Greenberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: The global economic crisis imposes severe restrictions on healthcare budgets, limiting the coverage of new interventions, even when they are cost-effective. Our objective was to develop a tool that can assist decision-makers in comparing the impact of medical intervention alternatives on the entire target population, under a pre-specified budget constraint. Methods: We illustrated the tool by using a target population of 1,000 patients, and a budget constraint of $1,000,000. We compared two intervention alternatives: the current practice that costs $1,000 and adds 0.5 quality-adjusted-life-years (QALYs) per patient and a new technology that costs 100 % more, and provides 20 % more QALYs per patient. We also developed a formula for defining the maximum premium price for a higher-cost/higher-effectiveness intervention that can justify its adoption under a constrained budget. Results: Using the new therapy will add 300 QALYs, compared to 500 QALYS when using the lower-cost, lower-effective intervention, despite a favorable incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $10,000. The maximum price for the higher-efficacy therapy that will preserve the target population outcomes is 20 % higher than the lower-cost therapy. Conclusions: Although an intervention associated with higher costs and higher efficacy may have an acceptable ICER, it could provide inferior outcomes in the target population under budget constraints, depending on the relative effectiveness and costs of the interventions. The cost premium that can be justified for a higher-efficacy intervention is directly correlated to its effectiveness premium. Using the proposed tool may assist decision-makers in improving overall healthcare outcomes, especially in times of economic downturn.

Original languageEnglish
Article number33
JournalInternational Journal for Equity in Health
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 24 Feb 2016

Keywords

  • Budget Impact
  • Cost-Effectiveness
  • Decision Making
  • Economic Outcome
  • Health Equity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Rethinking cost-effectiveness in the era of zero healthcare spending growth'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this