TY - JOUR
T1 - Risk prediction accuracy differs for emergency versus elective cases in the ACS-NSQIP
AU - Hyder, Joseph A.
AU - Reznor, Gally
AU - Wakeam, Elliot
AU - Nguyen, Louis L.
AU - Lipsitz, Stuart R.
AU - Havens, Joaquim M.
PY - 2016/11/28
Y1 - 2016/11/28
N2 - Background: Accurate risk estimation is essential when benchmarking surgical outcomes for reimbursement and engaging in shared decisionmaking. The greater complexity of emergency surgery patients may bias outcome comparisons between elective and emergency cases. Objective: To test whether an established risk modelling tool, the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACSNSQIP) predicts mortality comparably for emergency and elective cases. Methods: From the ACS-NSQIP 2011-2012 patient user files, we selected core emergency surgical cases also common to elective scenarios (gastrointestinal, vascular, and hepato-biliary-pancreatic). After matching strategy for Common Procedure Terminology (CPT) and year, we compared the accuracy of ACS-NSQIP predicted mortality probabilities using the observed-toexpected ratio (O:E), c-statistic, and Brier score. Results: In all, 56,942 emergency and 136,311 elective patients were identified as having a common CPT and year. Using a 1:1 matched sample of 37,154 emergency and elective patients, the O:E ratios generated by ACSNSQIP models differ significantly between the emergency [O:E = 1.031; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.028-1.033] and elective populations (O:E = 0.79; 95% CI = 0.77-0.80, P < 0.0001) and the c-statistics differed significantly (emergency c-statistic = 0.927; 95% CI = 0.921-0.932 and elective c-statistic = 0.887; 95% CI = 0.861-0.912, P = 0.003). The Brier score, tested across a range of mortality rates, did not differ significantly for samples with mortality rates of 6.5% and 9% (eg, emergency Brier score = 0.058; 95% CI = 0.048-0.069 versus elective Brier score = 0.057; 95% CI = 0.044-0.07, P = 0.87, among 2217 patients with 6.5% mortality). When the mortality rate was low (1.7%), Brier scores differed significantly (emergency 0.034; 95% CI = 0.027-0.041 versus elective 0.016; 95% CI = 0.009-0.023, P value for difference 0.0005). Conclusion: ACS-NSQIP risk estimates used for benchmarking and shared decision-making appear to differ between emergency and elective populations.
AB - Background: Accurate risk estimation is essential when benchmarking surgical outcomes for reimbursement and engaging in shared decisionmaking. The greater complexity of emergency surgery patients may bias outcome comparisons between elective and emergency cases. Objective: To test whether an established risk modelling tool, the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACSNSQIP) predicts mortality comparably for emergency and elective cases. Methods: From the ACS-NSQIP 2011-2012 patient user files, we selected core emergency surgical cases also common to elective scenarios (gastrointestinal, vascular, and hepato-biliary-pancreatic). After matching strategy for Common Procedure Terminology (CPT) and year, we compared the accuracy of ACS-NSQIP predicted mortality probabilities using the observed-toexpected ratio (O:E), c-statistic, and Brier score. Results: In all, 56,942 emergency and 136,311 elective patients were identified as having a common CPT and year. Using a 1:1 matched sample of 37,154 emergency and elective patients, the O:E ratios generated by ACSNSQIP models differ significantly between the emergency [O:E = 1.031; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.028-1.033] and elective populations (O:E = 0.79; 95% CI = 0.77-0.80, P < 0.0001) and the c-statistics differed significantly (emergency c-statistic = 0.927; 95% CI = 0.921-0.932 and elective c-statistic = 0.887; 95% CI = 0.861-0.912, P = 0.003). The Brier score, tested across a range of mortality rates, did not differ significantly for samples with mortality rates of 6.5% and 9% (eg, emergency Brier score = 0.058; 95% CI = 0.048-0.069 versus elective Brier score = 0.057; 95% CI = 0.044-0.07, P = 0.87, among 2217 patients with 6.5% mortality). When the mortality rate was low (1.7%), Brier scores differed significantly (emergency 0.034; 95% CI = 0.027-0.041 versus elective 0.016; 95% CI = 0.009-0.023, P value for difference 0.0005). Conclusion: ACS-NSQIP risk estimates used for benchmarking and shared decision-making appear to differ between emergency and elective populations.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84953323090&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001558
DO - 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001558
M3 - Article
C2 - 26727094
AN - SCOPUS:84953323090
SN - 0003-4932
VL - 264
SP - 959
EP - 965
JO - Annals of Surgery
JF - Annals of Surgery
IS - 6
ER -