Rose, J., The Revised Orwell: [Review]

Efraim Sicher

Rose, J., The Revised Orwell: [Review]

Department of Foreign Literatures & Linguistics

Research output: Contribution to journal › Book/Arts/Article review

Abstract

Revision is often a dirty word because it has been associated with a certain
kind of historical revisionism for which "all history was a palimpsest, scraped
clean, and reinscribed exactly as often as was necessary."

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	179-182
Number of pages	4
Journal	Utopian studies
Volume	6
Issue number	1
State	Published - 1995

Keywords

Book Reviews

Cite this

@article{0d35ba7584e14d92b71568fcb8adce0f,

title = "Rose, J., The Revised Orwell: [Review]",

abstract = "Revision is often a dirty word because it has been associated with a certain kind of historical revisionism for which {"}all history was a palimpsest, scraped clean, and reinscribed exactly as often as was necessary.{"} ",

keywords = "Book Reviews",

author = "Efraim Sicher",

year = "1995",

language = "English",

volume = "6",

pages = "179--182",

journal = "Utopian studies",

issn = "1045-991X",

publisher = "Penn State University Press",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rose, J., The Revised Orwell

T2 - [Review]

AU - Sicher, Efraim

PY - 1995

Y1 - 1995

N2 - Revision is often a dirty word because it has been associated with a certain kind of historical revisionism for which "all history was a palimpsest, scraped clean, and reinscribed exactly as often as was necessary."

AB - Revision is often a dirty word because it has been associated with a certain kind of historical revisionism for which "all history was a palimpsest, scraped clean, and reinscribed exactly as often as was necessary."

KW - Book Reviews

M3 - Book/Arts/Article review

SN - 1045-991X

VL - 6

SP - 179

EP - 182

JO - Utopian studies

JF - Utopian studies

IS - 1

ER -

Rose, J., The Revised Orwell: [Review]

Abstract

Keywords

Fingerprint

Cite this