TY - JOUR
T1 - Royal Developmentalism
T2 - Oil Disruptions and Socioeconomic Reforms in Iran and Saudi Arabia, 1953–79
AU - Shechter, Relli
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2025. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
PY - 2025/1/1
Y1 - 2025/1/1
N2 - Between 1953 and 1979, oil disruptions – the socioeconomic dislocations caused by petroleum wealth, from inflation and inequality to labor market transformation – reshaped the political economies of Iran and Saudi Arabia, driving both monarchies toward ‘royal developmentalism’, a form of authoritarian modernization. Despite their significant cultural differences, the two states followed similar paths in responding to oil-induced economic challenges, internal elite tensions, and revolutionary pressures across the region. This comparative analysis highlights how popular demands and regional dynamics, rather than autonomous state decisions or external impositions, shaped reforms such as Iran's White Revolution and Saudi Arabia's Ten-Point Program. Royal developmentalism has emerged as a strategy for monarchs to maintain political stability through ambitious socioeconomic initiatives that promise improved living conditions and greater equity. However, oil wealth also created new vulnerabilities: rapid modernization deepened inequalities, caused social contradictions, and fueled political unrest, eventually contributing to the 1979 Iranian Revolution and simultaneous uprisings in Saudi Arabia. These examples demonstrate that oil revenues alone do not ensure authoritarian stability, but rather catalyze complex interactions between states and societies, marked by escalating expectations and negotiations. This study explores how oil disruptions, regional competition, and internal conflicts influence state development strategies and offers insights into the contemporary challenges faced by oil-rich nations transitioning to post-oil economies.
AB - Between 1953 and 1979, oil disruptions – the socioeconomic dislocations caused by petroleum wealth, from inflation and inequality to labor market transformation – reshaped the political economies of Iran and Saudi Arabia, driving both monarchies toward ‘royal developmentalism’, a form of authoritarian modernization. Despite their significant cultural differences, the two states followed similar paths in responding to oil-induced economic challenges, internal elite tensions, and revolutionary pressures across the region. This comparative analysis highlights how popular demands and regional dynamics, rather than autonomous state decisions or external impositions, shaped reforms such as Iran's White Revolution and Saudi Arabia's Ten-Point Program. Royal developmentalism has emerged as a strategy for monarchs to maintain political stability through ambitious socioeconomic initiatives that promise improved living conditions and greater equity. However, oil wealth also created new vulnerabilities: rapid modernization deepened inequalities, caused social contradictions, and fueled political unrest, eventually contributing to the 1979 Iranian Revolution and simultaneous uprisings in Saudi Arabia. These examples demonstrate that oil revenues alone do not ensure authoritarian stability, but rather catalyze complex interactions between states and societies, marked by escalating expectations and negotiations. This study explores how oil disruptions, regional competition, and internal conflicts influence state development strategies and offers insights into the contemporary challenges faced by oil-rich nations transitioning to post-oil economies.
KW - authoritarian modernization
KW - rentier state
KW - royal developmentalism
KW - social agency
KW - social contract
KW - socioeconomic reform
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105019920702
U2 - 10.1177/00220094251375940
DO - 10.1177/00220094251375940
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105019920702
SN - 0022-0094
JO - Journal of Contemporary History
JF - Journal of Contemporary History
M1 - 00220094251375940
ER -