Selection and influence in cultural dynamics

David Kempe, Jon Kleinberg, Sigal Oren, Aleksandrs Slivkins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

One of the fundamental principles driving diversity or homogeneity in domains such as cultural differentiation, political affiliation, and product adoption is the tension between two forces: influence (the tendency of people to become similar to others they interact with) and selection (the tendency to be affected most by the behavior of others who are already similar). Influence tends to promote homogeneity within a society, while selection frequently causes fragmentation. When both forces act simultaneously, it becomes an interesting question to analyze which societal outcomes should be expected. To study this issue more formally, we analyze a natural stylized model built upon active lines of work in political opinion formation, cultural diversity, and language evolution. We assume that the population is partitioned into types according to some traits (such as language spoken or political affiliation). While all types of people interact with one another, only people with sufficiently similar types can possibly influence one another. The similarity is captured by a graph on types in which individuals of the same or adjacent types can influence one another. We achieve an essentially complete characterization of (stable) equilibrium outcomes and prove convergence from all starting states. We also consider generalizations of this model.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-27
Number of pages27
JournalNetwork Science
Volume4
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2016

Keywords

  • influence
  • opinion formation
  • selection
  • social networks

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Selection and influence in cultural dynamics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this